Editor for this issue: <>
I missed the discussion of dissimilation recently on Linguist, while I was at the Australian Linguistics Institute in Sydney. In Sydney I presented the data from my 1988 paper on Nasal Cluster Dissimilation (details were posted in the summary which I missed, I believe). Later Nick Clements presented a possible reanalysis in the light of suggestions in Donca Steriade's recent unpublished paper "Closure, release and nasal contours", in his Phonology course at ALI. What occurs in Gurindji relates to the following type of underlying string (omitting details): NO...X...NO where n is a nasal consonant and o an obstruent. Where the second cluster is homorganic, the second n is deleted; where it is heterorganic, the second n is denasalised. Such rules occur sporadically in a number of Australian languages scattered throughout the continent. In most of these the two clusters occur only in adjacent syllables; in Gurindji however the rule is long distance. One of the interesting aspects is characterising the variable X: it seems both the sonority hierarchy and (for some dialects) a hierarchy of place of articulation come into play. This is not the aspect I'd like to raise here, however. What I'd like to raise is whether this is truly a case of dissimilation. Given the marginal nature of dissimilation in phonological theory it would seem wise to reduce the number of cases that fall under this rubric, and explain them if possible in other terms. One idea that occurs to me that this could be a case of assimilation (feature spreading). The feature in this case would be a minus feature [-nasal], rather than the more common nasality spreading type. It strikes me that this may offend against proposed or assumed universals. I'd be grateful to receive any references to such proposals about constraints; to similar analyses of denasalisation; and to analyses involving spreading unmarked, minus features generally. Patrick McConvell Anthropology Northern Territory University PO Box 40146 Casuarina NT 0811 AustraliaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue