Editor for this issue: <>
I have a colleague in Serbia, too, with whom I would really need to establish e-mail connections. Yet I do not agree with Prof. Tomic's appeal and Wayles Browne's comments thereupon. It is certainly true that every kind of embargo affects lots of innocent ordinary citizens -- so did the embargo against South Africa -- but what if the alternative is to do nothing? I think the general opinion in Europe and the U.S.A. is that not enough has been done. At least it is hardly true that reestablishing the e-mail link would "contribute to Peace", as Prof. Tomic writes; it would be a clear sign that Serbia perhaps still counts as a state fulfilling the minimum standard of international conduct. What is more, the EARN connection does not only mean a line for innocent e-mail chat. There are lots of other services available through EARN/Bitnet and Internet, and I can imagine that access to data bases abroad could at least marginally have even strategic significance to Serbia. I am thoroughly convinced that the majority of university teachers in Serbia would be definitely against the use of the EARN connection by the present government, but it should still be remembered that part of highly-ranked academicians have been active in formulating Milosevic's policy from the very beginning. At least I would say that (1) data connections are not comparable to ordinary mail and telephone connections, and (2) the Serbian universities are hardly in the position of ensuring only "innocent" use of these connections. Prof. Tomic should not be "led to desperation" because of the cutting of the data connections. The embargo shows that the outside world is concerned with what happens in Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo, and that is something which certainly supports her strivings for peace. And that is more important than e-mail, isn't it? Jouko LindstedtMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue