Editor for this issue: <>
On Richard Ogden's observation that there is a tendency to use WE in such phrases as WE LINGUISTS, well way back in the 60s there as an adverstising campaign that I only remember because it drove my 7th grade English teacher to fits of apoplexy. It featured someone with a black eye and the slogan: "Us Terryton smokers would rather fight than switch." I can just imagine her writing to RJ Reynolds or whoever telling them to say "We Terryton smokers..." But can you imagine if they had followed her advice?! This is clearly a case of register. MichaelMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
wrt 3-651, for me the "we" in "we linguists" must agree in case. (1) Nobody likes us linguists. (2)**Nobody likes we linguists. However, in casual speech you get the accusative in nominative position: (3) Us linguists gotta stick together. This intuitively strikes me as coming from the same register that produces (4) Me and him like chocolate. Susan FischerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Richard Ogden remarks that one tends to find *we X* (as in *we linguists*) in both subject and object positions. I'll weigh in with the declaration that "*Nobody pays attention to we linguists* is odd and that I have no trouble with *Nobody pays attention to us linguists*. Indeed, in colloquial American English it seems to work the other way around: you get *us* in both positions, as in *Us linguists gotta stick together*. The fact that in American Eng. at least this is colloquial to the point of verging on the nonstandard would seem to suggest that *we X* in object position is indeed a hypercorrection. Michael KacMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue