Editor for this issue: <>
Lee Hartman asks about an article citing a paradoxical example like "There are three characters in the string 'dog.'" I believe the article he is referring to (or if not, one that makes the same point) is Geoffrey Pullum's "Punctuation and Human Freedom," originally published in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory in 1984 and reprinted in Pullum 1991, The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax and Other Irreverent Essays on the Study of Language (University of Chicago Press). Betty BirnerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
If you value your time and energy, give up! I have discussed this very question many times with my editor wife. She has two reasonable points. First, it looks better to have the punctuation mark inside the quotation marks. Second, other punctuation marks seem odd outside the quotation marks, especially in direct discourse in a narrative. For example: "How goes the battle"? he inquired. One small consolation: most editors don't give a rat's rear about single quotes. You can pretty much put them either inside or outside punctuation. SInce linguists use single quotes for glosses, you can sneak your preferred practice in at least for those! Small consolation, but hey, take it where you find it.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
> As you know, American practice calls for a period or comma to go > inside the quotation marks, regardless of the logic or sense of the quote. I have often heard that this convention is related to the history of U.S. printing, but I can't find any written information on that bit of history. I would appreciate any leads anybody can send me on where I might find out more on the subject. I asked the question on HUMANIST, but so far the responses I've gotten have been from people who have also heard that the history of printing is involved but who also don't know any details and who want me to let them know what I find out. Since I'll be reading a paper on this topic in less than two months, I'm eager to find out what I can as soon as I can. Natalie Maynor (maynorMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuera.msstate.edu) English Department, Mississippi State University