Editor for this issue: <>
In a recent issue of _Language and Speech_ [1991, 34(2), 109-143], Chalikia and Warren report that when listeners are presented with recycling sequences of brief steady-state vowels they report hearing verbal forms. It is further suggested that "...the verbal forms heard not only followed the phonotactic rules of English, but also corresponded to syllables actually found in English" (p. 109). Is anyone aware of an English syllabary (hardbound or computer based),i.e. a list of syllables actually found in the English language? Any information would be greatly appreciated. Please send information directly to: keriMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecsd4.csd.uwm.edu Thanks, Keri Riener
[Back in June, I submitted the following query, but got no replies; perhaps people were on vacation. I'd like to try again.] I have a reference to an article by Lenneberg describing an experiment in which high school students were given Sarah the chimp's symbols to manipulate: E. Lenneberg, "Neuropsychological Comparison between Man, Chimpanzee, and Monkey," Neuropsychologia 13 (1975) 125. Yet my library tells me that neither author nor title are in the index to Vol. 13. Can someone please give me a correct reference? Thanks. William J. Rapaport Associate Professor of Computer Science and Center for Cognitive Science Dept. of Computer Science||internet: rapaportMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecs.buffalo.edu SUNY Buffalo ||bitnet: rapaport
sunybcs.bitnet Buffalo, NY 14260 ||uucp: {rutgers,uunet}!cs.buffalo.edu!rapaport (716) 636-3193, 3180 ||fax: (716) 636-3464
There are many examples, I believe, where what even the best "ear" phoneticians systematically mishear what is actually uttered. An example might be the fricative pronunciations of English /k/ and /g/ in intervocalic position. I would be interested in any references that people to have to published work on this subject (since I have few if any).Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue