Editor for this issue: <>
A recent posting writes: > My favorite antimony is the story of the hanged prisoner, and one > of the best discussion I've seen of antimony and paradox is "Antimony" is a metal (symbol Sb, from Latin stibium); he means "antinomy". I wonder how common this spoonerism (metathesis, if you want to be formal) is? Neither word is likely to be much used except by the learned. My dictionary says that the [name of the] metal is primary-stressed on the first syllable, and the paradox on the second; but "antinomy" is one of those words which, on the face of them, I have to FORCE myself to stress correctly. I wonder how much effect that has on the confusion; and also whether there's an influence from whatever often causes children to pronounce "animal" as "aminal". Mark A. Mandel Dragon Systems, Inc. : speech recognition : +1 617 965-5200 320 Nevada St. : Newton, Mass. 02160, USAMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Is there a possibility that English is forming a new linguistic rule that stipulates that compounded personal pronouns must be in the nominative regardless of conventional considerations of case. I have heard and read examples of this phenomenon's occurrance not only after prepostions but as direct and indirect objects. Is this tendency more prevalent in American than in British English? Hans Gilde hmgunlinfoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueunl.edu (402) 472-1786
Has anyone made a start on analyzing one of the major semantic viruses of the 90s, the ubiquitous "like"? (Attested: So I'm there, like goin' "yeah"; He like works, like fixing like tires.) It seems to function variously as a filler, a marker of concession, approximation, qualification, emphasis, irony, disbelief...What else? Terry Gordon (WTGORDONMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueAC.DAL.CA)
Dear Friends: We would like to set up a discussion list that promote communication among teachers, researchers and students of Chinese. Topics for such discussion may include: 1)theory and practice in teaching Chinese as a foreign language, 2)linguistics, literature and the teaching of Chinese, 3) technology and the teaching of Chinese, 4)creative classroom activities... If you think this is a good idea, please send your comments and your e-mail address to one of the names below. Once we find enough people interested in this, we will try to find a site for the list. Jianhua Bai, Kenyon College baiMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuevax001.kenyon.edu Tim Xie, UC Davis twxie
ucdavis.edu