Editor for this issue: <>
I have received numerous responses to my query about the pronunciation of the German diminutive suffix -chen. As far back as the 1930's, Daniel Jones and Leonard Bloomfield worried about the phonemic analysis of this element, a problem which has recently cropped up again in the context of lexical phonology. One of the issues that was raised by Bloomfield and occasionally came up later in the phonemic literature is whether -chen is distinct in some way from a sequence of ch-e-n that would occur outside of this suffix. My query took two forms: (1) Do forms like Griechen, riechen, etc. (where -chen is not a suffix) rhyme with Viehchen (which is Vieh+chen)? (2) Is Eichen 'oaks' (where again -chen is not a suffix) homophonous with Eichen 'little egg' (which is Ei+chen)? The majority of respondents felt that the answer is yes in both cases. A significant minority felt (as I had originally suggested) that there is a difference, although the descriptions of the difference in question differ among themselves and often are very impressionistic. Certainly, one possible difference that has been mentioned is that the suffix -chen keeps its vowel, whereas a -ch-e-n sequence otherwise has no vowel, just a syllabic nasal. I should add that this division in judgements corroborates what happened during the discussion of this topic among phonemicists in the 1950's. It would thus seem that we may be dealing with a genuine distinction between the speech of some speakers and that of others.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue