Editor for this issue: <>
In consideration of the recent discussion and inquiries on LINGUIST about the status of Han'gulnal, or Korean Alphabet Day, I am posting the following message on this matter sent to me by the president of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics, Young-Key Kim-Renaud of George Washington University: Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 20:07:59 EDT From: Young-Key Kim-Renaud <KIMRENAUMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuegwuvm.gwu.edu> Subject: Re: Han'gul nal Dear Greg: It was nice to hear from you. I am glad that there is an even more ambitious proposal than making Han-gul Day a national holiday. As you know, in my capacity of the president of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics, I proposed and obtained an enthusiastic support from those who attended our rec ent 8th ICKL meeting last August at GWU for reestablishing the Korean Alphabet Day as a national holiday. The proposal with signatures by all those who were present at the meeting and some spectators was sent to the President of the Republic of Korea in the month of September, but so far we have not received a response. Given the transitory status of the current president, I am highly skeptical that the issue would even be discussed. I kept a copy of all the signatures and I will send it to the new president who will be elected in Dec. In the meantime, I would welcome any more letters and signatures of support for this proposal which I will attach to my next correspondence to the Korean head of state. Thanks again for all your interest and support. Best regards, YK.
My experience with Korean (both active and passive) tells me that "Hangul" is pronounced with an unrounded high central vowel (barred "i") in the place of the orthographic _u_. All else is unmarked. As for Mr. Lim's comment about Hangul Day being pronounce "han-gul-nal", I'd say that "han-gul-lal" might also be a pronunciation, thanks to a regular rule of lateralization. "han-gul-nal" would be a more accurate representation of the underlying form. --David J. Silva (djsilvaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesuvm), Syracuse University