Editor for this issue: <>
I recently posted a query to the list about diacritics. This is a summary of the responses I received. Thanks to: Geoff Husic, Stavros Macrakis (citing also work by J. W. van Wingen <BUTPAA%HLERUL2.BITNETMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuepsuvm.psu.edu> and Ed Hart of Johns Hopkins University, <ISO10646
JHUVM>), Jim Critz, and David Harnick-Shapiro for responses. It appears that diacritics are governed by ISO standards, the ones that have been cited being: ISO 10646, ISO 6937. I have not checked these myself at this stage. The following bibliography was cited: H. F. Wendt, Fischer Lexikon Sprachen, Frankfurt am Main, 1961 R. S. Gilyarevskiy & V. S. Grivnin, Opredelitel' Yazikov Mira po Pis'mennostyam, Moskwa, 1961 A. Nakanishi, Writing Systems of the World, Rutland, Vermont, 1980 Teach Yourself books series De spelling van de Nederlandse taal, den Haag, 1975 A Magyar Helyes/ir/as Szab/alyai, Budapest, 1987 The Unicode Standard, Vol. 1, published by Addison-Wesley Publishers. If your Computer Science Department or library do not have it, a local technical bookstore should have it or be able to order it for you. (Vol. 2 deals with ideographic character sets.) Finally, reference was made to: ALA_LC Romanization tables, which gives tranliterations for non-Roman script languages and therefore necessarily discusses diacritics. Laurie Bauer BauerL
matai.vuw.ac.nz Wellington, New Zealand