Editor for this issue: <>
We are in the process of revising our Ph.D. language and comprehensive examination requirements at Michigan State. Of course, we can consult catalogs to determine sister institution requirements, but I would very much like to hear of any recent changes at sister institutions which may not yet be in print or, more pertinently from this list, any comments or suggestions. I think this is not of enough general interest to summarize to the entire net, but I will be happy to save a downloading of any interesting discussion and send it to any who request it. Dennis Preston <22709mgrMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemsu.bitnet>
I'm interested in doing a survey of focus constructions amongst the world's languages. I don't know how many languages have been looked at sufficiently closely for the question to be properly asked. But i know of some languages (e.g. English) in which (unless one uses a cleft construction) a constituent getting at least contrastive focus is typically put as late in the clause as is grammatically possible: 1a. I gave a book to JOHN. b. I gave John A BOOK. 2a. We put the books ON THE TABLE. b. On the table we put THE BOOKS. I know of other languages (Hungarian, Sanskrit, and many other South Asian languages) in which the focussed constituent is typically put in a position immediately adjacent to the verb. In Hungarian, the focus position is as far as i know always before the verb, but i'm not convinced this is the case in all languages with 'adverbal' focus. Does anyone know of any other options? I'd like to know what there is in the literature on as many languages as possible. If adverbal vs. clause-final focus are the only options (apart from biclausal constructions like the English cleft), can any typological generalizations be reliably made about them? For instance, do all languages with typically adverbal focus favour head-final phrase structure? Do all languages with typically clause-final focus favour head-initial phrase structure? Any suggestions, especially of good published studies, and discussion welcome. If desired i'll post a summary. Thanks Steven ------ Dr. Steven Schaufele 217-344-8240 712 West Washington Ave. fcoswsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueux1.cso.uiuc.edu Urbana, IL 61801 *** O syntagmata linguarum liberemini humanarum! *** **** Nihil vestris privari nisi obicibus potestis! ****
When people say THAT'S ALL SHE WROTE, the intonation they use indicates that they mean "that's everything she wrote". Once in a while, however, someone will say it as if it were "THAT'S ALL", SHE WROTE. Dooes anybody know which of the two is the original? This is similar, it seems to me, to Leo Durocher's famous NICE GUYS FINISH LAST which he never said. What happened was that one day during spring training, he was sitting with a sports reporter watching the team they were going to face that day practicing before the game. The reporter asked him what he thought about that team's chances that year, and he said: "Nice guys. Finish last", i.e. they're nice guys but they'll finish last. Does anybody know of any other cases of this type? Marc PicardMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Can anyone provide me with judgements on the following Georgian sentences? (1a) guSin vc'erdi c'erilebs. (1b) guSin vc'ere c'erilebi. (1c) guSin c'erilebis c'eraSi viqavi. (2a) guSin mteli saGamo vc'erdi c'erilebs. (2b) guSin mteli saGamo vc'ere c'erilebi. (2c) guSin mteli saGamo c'erilebis c'eraSi viqavi. (3a) guSin sami saati vc'erdi c'erilebs. (3b) guSin sami saati vc'ere c'erilebi. (3c) guSin sami saati c'erilebis c'eraSi viqavi. (4a) mteli c'eli vc'erdi c'erilebs. (4b) mteli c'eli vc'ere c'erilebi. (4c) mteli c'eli c'erilebis c'eraSi viqavi. (5a) erti saati vk'idodi surats. (5b) erti saati vk'ide surati. (5c) erti saati suratis k'idvaSi viqavi. (6a) dGes dilit Cais vsvamdi. (6b) dGes dilit Cai vlie. (6c) dGes dilit Cai davlie. didi madloba, --Ivan A DerzhanskiMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue