Editor for this issue: <>
Does anyone know of a verb in English (or any other language, for that matter) which is OBLIGATORILY ECM? The closest I've been able to come is _consider_: (1) I consider Mary to be intelligent. (2) *I consider that Mary is intelligent. But this is not as clear as it might appear, since _consider_ does take a tensed _that_ clause when it is used in a factive sense: (3) Considering that Mary has never been to Arizona, she really knows a lot about it. For those of you more familiar with Standard Theory terminology, what I am asking is whether there are verbs which obligatorily trigger SOR (Subject to Object Raising). Please respond directly to me. Thanks! -Grant Goodall fd00Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueutep.bitnet
This is query/request for information on work done on the interaction of monolog and dialog. Or in CA terms -of when and where and how speakers take extended turns and what those turns accomplish. Any work on this area - I can't find any - would be appreciated. Discourse analytic attempts at the analysis of monolog - since Montgomery /Coulthard - would also be most welcome. yours John WheatleyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
A colleague is wondering whether anyone knows of a computational procedure for deciding whether a string is a possible word in English, using, for example, morphological rules and without resorting to a dictionary or lexicon lookup. Please respond to me directly--I will summarize the responses. Thanks! ernie limperis ernieMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuenli.com
On behalf of a student in a class that I taught this past quarter, I'm writing to inquire whether Afrikaans, like Dutch, has voiced velar fricatives. The question arises in the context of a phonology problem in which no such segments appear phonetically in the data but in which there's motivation for positing them underlyingly. Please respond to me directly at the following address: kacMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecs.umn.edu Many thanks. Michael Kac