Editor for this issue: <>
A number of people, who probably would prefer to remain nameless, attributed the discovery of the equivalence given in the subject line to Bruce Derwing in his book 'TG as a theory of language acquisition'. However, several people pointed out that this point had been made much earlier by Chomsky in Aspects (p. 33 and fn. 20 on pp. 202-3), Gil Harman being the one who sent the actual complete reference. Thanks to all on this. I must confess, however, that in light of this even I, who continually denounce the ahistorical nonsense that passes for the teaching of linguistics, am astonished. I certainly was taught that discovery procedures were one of the principal things that Chomsky took the structuralists to task for, and I wonder if other LINGUISTs have not had the same experience. (It turns out, of course, that Chomsky was objecting to what he perceived (incorrectly, as Michael Kac points out) as one of the central features of the structuralist approach to discovery procedures, namely, that they amounted to a proposed mechanism for discovering a correct theory, something which is presumably impossible. But, in actual fact, it was the structuralists who emphasized the non-uniqueness of grammatical analysis (cf. Chao) and, on the other hand, in the mind of the child who is learning a language with the help of his LAD, presumably a unique theory (which may not, however, be correct!) does emerge, this being the grammar which (s)he is supposed to be acquiring. So the shoe would appear to be perhaps on the other foot. BUT it would have been nice to have been taught someting approximating the facts when one was learning linguistics for the first time.)Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Thanks to all who wrote in on this question. Barbara Hall Partee suggested, almost certainly correctly, that the term 'autonomy' was first used by Chomsky in his paper 'Questions of Form and Interpretation', which is, incidentally, the only place he dwells on this topic in detail. Larry Trask points out, however, that the term 'autonomous syntax' may have been used earlier by Pieter Seuren. Incidentally, I asked Chomsky the same question and his recollections, while hazy, agree with Barbara's. It may not be inappropriate to add that those who, like me, read this paper of Chomsky's for the first time (it appears in a collection ed. by Robt. Austerlitz, Scope of American Linguistics), will be quite surprised as to what his position of both autonomy of syntax and autonomy of grammar actually was at that time.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue