Editor for this issue: <>
In response to Bruce Nevin's posting on the 1905 retro-NOT from "Pigs is Pigs": That citation certainly does take pride of place as far as I know. I had earlier posted two citations from "Comrades of the Saddle", a juvenile Western (not featuring Irish immigrants as far as I can tell) published in 1910. The two relevant passages (contexts provided on request) were "You're a fine commander to be lieutenant for--not", declared Horace. (p. 68) "He's a fine neighbor--not", declared Larry. (p. 145) [Frank V. Webster, "Comrades of the Saddle". New York: Cupples & Leon.] Also published in 1910 was a "Little Nemo in Slumberland" comic strip, New York Herald, Feb. 13, 1910, in which the eponymous hero dreams up a "big flying machine" which he uses to deliver, as a favor to the postmaster, billions of Valentine's Day cards, one of which--dropped down to a bullying policeman, reads "YOU ARE A BRAVE COP NOT". The Nemo datum I owe to Richard Piepenbrock, and the Webster ones to John Wildanger. Pace Bruce, I'm pretty sure there were no citations provided by Larry Hyman, but he may have just been applying the well-known or-->yma/Larry H__n rule. --Larry Horn (I think)Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
This may or may not be relevant to the discussion I caught the tail end of, but constructions with dummy 'one' need not involve adjectives, it seems to me. An NP like 'a history one' seems perfectly OK, and so do things like 'I want one, too' (where no modifier need be understood), and 'I want one with a cherry on top'. Thus, I am not sure that 'one' is a good example of what it was supposed to be the only attested instance of.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue