Editor for this issue: <>
Some students who do not have access to the Linguist List are looking for studies of contraction of "not", modals, and auxiliaries in the history of English, particularly from about 1700 on. Please respond directly to me, and I will pass the responses on. If there is enough interest, I will post a summary to the Linguist List. Susan Pintzuk pintzukMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuebabel.ling.upenn.edu
I see in the NY Times today that there is a review of the book about Genie that was excerpted in the New Yorker some time ago. I don't want to rehash the discussion that occurred on linguist.list when the articles originally appeared. I have a question, however. The NY Times review repeats the author's assertion that the publication of _Syntactic Structures_ is known among linguists as "The Event." This was news to me. My question is whether indeed there is a part of the linguistic universe in which the statement is true. I mean, there must be at least one person (the individual who talked to the writer) for whom it is true, but are there others? Have I failed to spend enough time at MIT or what? Mark SeidenbergMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
F\Does anyone know whether Jack Chambers at Univerisy of Toronto has an e-mail address and if so what it is?? Ditto Peter Trudgill. Please reply to HolmesjMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuematai.vuw.ac.nz