Editor for this issue: <>
It seems to me that an automatic response to words rather than meanings is always unfortunate. It is literaly a reaction to the most superficial parts of a message. It is ironic that in the particular case of 'nigger' that the long- standing African-American usage of the term as more or less synonymous with 'guy' is spreading beyond that community. On the subways of NY, an excellent place to do amateur sociolinguistics, I've heard it used by members of biracial groups of teens, and once a pair of white kids (who might have been New Yoricans, NYers of Puerto Rican origin). No one turned their head. On the other hand, the use by a white teacher as an example, provoked a student riot a couple of years back. A teacher friend suggests that what probably happened was that some students just weren't paying attention, heard only the word, and spead the message that Teacher X said "nigger" to the students, etc. etc. But even here, the reaction was to a perceived use of the term and not to its sim- ple use. Consciously modeled on the African-American use 'nigger' is the by now fairly settled use of dyke, and the still somewhat controversial use of 'queer.' My brother, who's straight, uses 'queer' quite freely around me and his room; both of us gay. Of course, we don't take offense, though my sociolinguistic ear was certainly turned. I'm not sure if it because he's just decided it's the term, because he thinks's it shows what a cool straight he is, or because it avoids the cumbersome 'lesbian and gay.' Michael NewmanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue