Editor for this issue: <>
What constitutes evidence for or against a hypothetical linguistic typological universal? I ask because a certain amount of research in the past few years, most notably Chomsky 1991, 1992 has been based on a paper whose fundamental claim, unless i am much mistaken, is grievously flawed. Pollock 1989 argues that the dichotomy, which few would challenge, between V-raising in French and AGR-lowering in English is related to the relative richness or poverty of subject-agreement marking in the two languages. This in spite of the fact that *phonetically*, subject-agreement marking in French is not much richer than in English. Furthermore, if richness of morphophonological subject-agreement marking is supposed to be the critical issue in this hypothesis, which in absence of any clear disclaimers appears to be the case, Pollock's hypothesis seems to either make many wrong predictions or, at the very least, to go directly counter to some independent comparative research that had not, at least as of the time Pollock's paper was published, as far as i know been seriously contested. To wit: (1) Pollock himself admits that Holmberg's 1986 analysis of Scandinavian syntax seems to constitute a counterexample to his hypothesis, but doesn't pursue it very far. Holmberg's analysis has been challenged by Sigurdsson 1991, but it strikes me as disturbing that Pollock allows it to go by without challenging it himself. (2) Koopman 1983 argues that V rises to AGR in the Kru languages just as it does in French although these languages have no subject-agreement marking at all. To the best of my knowledge, Pollock doesn't address this. (3) Hyams 1986 argues that in Italian the verb typically remains within the VP throughout the derivation, in spite of Italian's manifestly rich subject-agreement marking. To the best of my knowledge, Pollock doesn't address Hyams' arguments either. I have recently been told that someone (Belletti? Rizzi?) has challenged Hyams' analysis, proposing that the entire verbal complex in Italian rises to AGR. Does anybody have any references on this? (4) Boskovic 1991 has argued that in Serbo-Croatian, a language with very rich subject-agreement marking, AGR routinely descends to V, which latter often remains within the VP throughout the derivation. In fact, Boskovic presents arguments that AGR-lowering is typical of pro-drop languages (=languages allowing phonologically empty subjects), a claim that on the face of it would be directly contrary to Pollock's. I don't expect Pollock to have addressed Boskovic' arguments, or course, and i've been informed that Margarita Suner has evidence that Spanish routinely raises verbs to AGR, which would seem to falsify Boskovic' hypothesis. (5) I have argued (Schaufele 1991) that in Vedic Sanskrit, a language with very rich subject-agreement marking, the verb normally remained within the VP throughout the derivation, and that therefore AGR must have descended to it. Portions of my rationale have been challenged and the jury is still out on the issue. (6) I have also argued (Schaufele 1993) that English retained the ability to raise theta-rich verbs to AGR for about 2-3 centuries after it lost almost all its subject-agreement marking. If Pollock is correct, this would mean that several generations of Englishpeople were routinely violating the ECP. I'm sure it's possible to provide alternative theoretical accounts for any one of these apparent counterexamples that would salvage Pollock's hypothesis -- note my acknowledgments of the existence of some proposed such alternative analyses. My question is, if that is the case, what would constitute a *real* counterexample to Pollock's hypothesis? How is it falsifiable? * * * * * * * * * * * * REFERENCES Boskovic, Zeljko. 1991. 'On the Null-Subject Parameter' paper read at the 44th Kentucky Foreign Language Conference, 26 April 1991. Chomsky, Noam. 1991. 'Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation' in Robert Freidin, ed. Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, pp. 417-454. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chomsky, Noam. 1992. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Stockholm. Hyams, Nina M. 1986. Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel. Koopman, Hilda. 1983. The Syntax of Verbs: from Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar. Studies in Generative Grammar 15. Dordrecht: Foris. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. 'Verb-Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP' Linguistic Inquiry 20:365-424. Schaufele, Steven. 1991. 'Richness of Subject-Agreement Marking and V-AGR Merger: the Verdict of Vedic' paper read at the 20th Annual Conference on South Asia, Madison, WI, 1 Nov. 1991. To appear in the Proceedings. Schaufele, Steven. 1993. 'The History of VP-Adverbials, V-AGR Merger, and Loss of Subject-Agreement Marking in English: a Case Study in Corpus-Based Diachronic Syntactic Research' paper presented before the Washington Linguistic Society, Georgetown University, 15 April 1993. Sigurdsson, Halldor Armann. 1991. 'Icelandic Case-Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments.' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9:327-363. ------ Dr. Steven Schaufele c/o Department of Linguistics 712 West Washington Ave. University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 4088 Foreign Languages Building 707 South Mathews Street 217-344-8240 Urbana, IL 61801 fcoswsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueux1.cso.uiuc.edu
Query: Chinese teaching/learning materials I am looking for video-supported teaching materials for Chinese (Mandarin) and COMPUTER SOFTWARES for LEARNING Chinese. I would appreciate any information on where these are available and how to order them. Please reply to me directly. Thanks in advance. Daming Xu Phone: 613-596-2594 Fax: 613-230-2047 Email: DAMINGXUMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueUOTTAWA.BITNET
I recently saw a reference to a new book--I believe from Scandinavia-- about Slavic elements in Albanian. Can anyone give me the exact title, author, and publishing details? Thank you--Wayles Browne, jn5jMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecornell.bitnet // jn5j
cornell.cit.cornella.edu
Could anyone tell me what exactly the difference is between the following Yoruba sentences? (1) Mo ra` i`we'. (2) Mo ra` i`we' ni. I would be interested in the sorts of contexts in which (1) and (2) above can be uttered felicitously. Thank you -- Laszlo KalmanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue