Editor for this issue: <>
Dear List, working on the formation of long relative clauses (or the impossibility thereof), we are looking for languages which do NOT allow for the formation of long relatives, i.e. languages in which the counterpart of the English the man who I think (that) I saw t would be ungrammatical (as it is e.g. in German). In particular, we are interested in cases where i) the impossibility of long relativization contrasts with the possibility of short relativization from the same grammatical function, and/or ii) the impossibility of long relativization contrasts with the possibility of long topicalization and/or wh-movement. Please respond to us directly. We will post a summary, if the number of responses suggest that the topic is of general interest. Thanks in advance, Katharina Hartmann (hartmannMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelingua.uni-frankfurt.dbp.de) Daniel Buering (amd01
rs2.rrz.uni-koeln.de)
Could any native Japanese speakers out there help me sort out the constraints on demonstrative articles and plural markers? Consider the following sentences (from real texts): 1) Kao o agetara, otoko no ko ga sannin tatte te, ... de SONO OTOKO NO KO ga ... koo ... nanka ... koboreta kudamono o hirotte kuretari, ... Question #1: Does SONO OTOKO NO KO in the second sentence here sound OK? In particular, does it sound OK to omit the TATI on the noun even thought the referent is obviously plural here? 2) Heya ni hairu to, misiranu otoko ga sannin matte ita. SONO OTOKO-TATI ga titi-o torimakoo-to sita toki ni watasi wa muisikini himei o ageta. Question #2: Would it sound OK to drop the TATI in the second sentence here? If not, why not? Does it have anything to do with the selectional restrictions on torimaku? Taisoo osewa ni narimasita! Pamela Downing downingMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueconvex.csd.uwm.edu
Does anybody know of a case where lateral affricates derive historically from something else, notably (but not necessarily) from aspirated or velarized ([tx] and the like) coronals?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue