Editor for this issue: <>
The following is an excerpt from a message forwarded by rodmanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueADM.CSC.NCSU.EDU (Dr Robert D Rodman). This certainly does not represent my view of human language nor that ofi the linguists I know. I find it deeply troubling that ARPA should consider the study of language to be other than through basic science. If others agree with me, what should we do? I am just sending two paragraphs but will be happy to send the whole megilla to anyone who wishes to see it. Vicki Fromkin ************************************************** baa9331 Information sent on ARPA's Human Language Technology (HLT) program. ====================================================================== The mission of ARPA's human language technology program is human language processing competence. Thus the primary interest and the focus of evaluation is in language processing competence (accuracy), not in system performance issues such as speed, memory, cost, etc. The HLT program emphasizes R&D effort directed toward productive functionality rather than toward basic scientific studies. The rationale for this emphasis is that human language is a "synthetic" process, a result of social evolution, and that it is characterized and measured more by cognitive objective rather than by fundamental science or scientific understanding.