Editor for this issue: <>
>Alex Monaghan said: >> karen kay writes: >> >> > I thought that bimbo was Italian for 'child'? >> >> is this a case of "uptalk" (recent newspaper article starring mclemore) >> in orthography? if so, is it common? i find it really bizarre to mark this >> kind of thing with a question mark? > >I don't know what uptalk is. I used the question mark to indicate rising >intonation, which I would use if I were saying this sentence. I use >question intonation for statements I'm not quite sure of. I think this >is a common feature of English > >Karen Kay What's called 'high rising intonation in statements' is an increasingly common feature of Australian English first noticed as an aberration in an interview situation in 1965. Its social distribution has been studied and also its meaning and function. For five references see Turner, George. 1991. "Australian English and general studies of English" in Michael Clyne (ed) LINGUISTICS IN AUSTRALIA: TRENDS IN RESEARCH. Academy of the Social Sciences in Australa. Canberra.(!SBN 0 908290 17 9. Regards, Penny Lee.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I read that article too, although I don't remember where. The locution in question is exactly what the author meant by uptalk, which Karen Kay has defined rather precisely as rising intonation to indicate uncertainty. Ron Fein 25 Ellery Street Cambridge, MA 02138 USA fein2Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehusc11.harvard.edu fein2
husc11.bitnet (617) 576-0640 ............. "But this one goes to 11." - Nigel Tufnel
Clearly, some'a y'all have NEVer been south of the Mason-Dixon line! The abbreviated form of "you-all" is considered not only appropriate but necessary from southern Maryland to northern San Antonio! And while the derivation of the spelling (apostrophe and all) may not have been overseen by a grammarian, the form is adhered to across the southern states. Anne Gilman formerly of Alexandria, VIRGINIA PS This is my first posting. Y'all are terrific!Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Re: the origin of O.K. There are dozens of different stories on this old chestnut, but to my mind the most convincing by far is that it was part of black slave talk, originally used as a private code, and like many other black words, can be traced back to Wolof, a language of the Gold Coast (I think) which was a main staging area for slavers. (I ain't selling no Wolof tickets on this one...). The work was done by someone at S.O.A.S. in London about 20 years ago, but the name and a lot of the details have blurred with time. I do, however, remember some of the examples: OK was something like 'waw kay', literally 'alright', the word for 'man' was 'guy' (or perhaps 'gay'!) while the word for 'pink' was 'hong'. This with an agentive suffix -ki gives 'hongki', 'pink one'. I remember the stuff was a lot more linguistically and sociologically convincing than 'Old Kinderhook' or 'orl korrekt'! greetings, Paul Werth.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Alan Walker Read has written several papers about this: Read A W, `The Folklore of "O.K."', American Speech, Vol. 39, pp. 5-25, 1964 Read A W, `Later Stages in the History of "O.K."', American Speech, Vol. 39, pp. 83-101, 1964 Read A W, `Successive Revisions in the History of "O.K."', American Speech, Vol. 39, pp. 243-267, 1964 He found that it came from two sources, "Old Kinderhook", an expression used in the presidential campaign of Martin Van Buren, and "Oll Korect". Bob krovetzMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecs.umass.edu
OK comes from Oll Korrect a jocular newspaper spelling of the 19th C in the US. i know this sounds implausible but it is well authenticated. trust me.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I am sending this to LINGUIST as well as to the 'query asker' since it may be of interest to others but I leave it to the editors as to whether you want to include it. ==================================================================== Definition of O.K. as given in HORSE-FEATHERS& OTHER CURIOUS WORDS by Charles Earle Funk and Charles Earle Funk, Jr., 1986. Perennial Library, Harper & Row. "Although these initials are now known and used around the world and have been in common American usage for a hundred years, the source was a matter of great disputation through most of that period. Some attributed it to illiteracy displayed by Andrew Jackson, who, they said, wrote O.K. as the initials of "Oll Korrect." Others thought the source was a misreading of the initials O.R., "Order Recorded", indicating official approval of a document. And some believed that the initials were an erroneous rendering of the Choctaw okeh "it is so". All dispute ceased in 1941. In that year, in the July 19 issue of the Saturday Review of Literature, in an 8 page article, "The Evidence on O.K.", Allen Walker Read laid the ghost for all time. By dint of much research he traced the initials back to 1840, finding the first appearance in print in the NY New Era of March 23. The reference was to a political organization supporting the candidacy of Martin Van Buren for a second term in the White House. The members called themselves the Democratic O.K. Club, taking the initials from Old Kinderhook, a title bestowed upon Van Buren from the name of the village, Kinderhook, in the valley of the Hudson where he was born. The mystifying initials, as a sort of rallying cry, caught the fancy of other supporters immediately, and were used, according to the NY Herald of March 28, by these supporters in a raid upon a meeting of the Whigs the previous evening. "About 500 stout, strapping men," the paper reported, "marched three and three, noiselessly and orderly. The word O.K. was passed from mouth to mouth, a cheer was given, and they rushed into the hall upstairs, like a torrent."Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue