Editor for this issue: <>
THIS WAS THE QUESTION: >I am working on Nominal Phrases Processing from the point of views of >the Reference. Concretely, I deal with the topics of logic and pragmatic >specifity and the definiteness in the nominal phase. >I will be very greeting for any modern reference book or article about >this that you can provide. >I am interested in the Irene Heim' PhD (Mass.Univ) about the semantics of >(in)definiteness nominal phrases. I'd like know if it is published and >how I can get it. >Thanks. Amparo Alcina alcinaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuevm.ci.uv.es Dept. Teoria dels Llenguatges Valencia University Avda. Blasco Ibanyez, 28 46010 Valencia THESE ARE THE ANSWERS: This is the literature recommended about the topic: Ariel, Mira, 1990, Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. Routledge. London and New York. 265pp Charolles, Michel (ed), 1986, Research in text connexity and text coherence: a survey. Chesterman, Andrew, 1991, On Definiteness: A Study with special reference to English and Finish. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 56. Cambridge University Press. Diesing,Molly, 1992, Indefinites. MIT (LI Monographs 20) 175pp An implementation of Heim s idea. En+, Murvet, (an article in Linguistic Inquiri, 1991). Groenendijk and Stokhof, 1980, (article) in F. Heny (ed), Ambiguities in intensional Contexts. D. Reide. Heim, Irene R., The semantics of (in)definitess noun phrases. Garland Press, New York. Ioup, 1977, (article) in Linguistics and Philosophy. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle, From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht. (An introduction to the Discourse Reference Theory, in which is based the Heim s PhD). Keizer, Evelien, Reference, predication and (in)definiteness in Functional Grammar. PhD Free Univ., Amsterdam. ( J.L. Mackenzie) Kleiber, G. (a lot of works about reference, I have not concrete works). Neale, Stephen, 1990, Descriptions. MIT Press. (Defends the Russell theory, againts the Heim idea). Paducheva, Elena V., 1985, Vykazyvanie i ego ssotnesennost s dejstvitel'nost'ju. Moskva. (Written in Russian. Some people think it is the best book about reference and NNPP). Prince, Ellen, (a lot of works about the topic: en P.Cole (ed) 1985, Radical Pragmatics, en I PrA papers in Pragmatics, vol 2, 1988, en A.Joshi (ed) Elements of Discourse Understanding) Ruys, E.G., 1993, The scope of Indefinites, Led, Utrecht. (With a good literature about the logic aspects of reference). Reuland, Eric J. and Alice Ter Meulen, 1987, The representation of (in)definiteness. MIT Press. Car Studies in Linguistics 87. Strand, Kjetil, 1992, "Constraints on Noun Phrase Indexing in Text Comprehension" (I have received this article, but I have not notice about its publication. If anyone is interested, I can offer the author electronic adress).
I recently asked the question of whether "g" and "j" are pronounced identically before "e" and "i" in Spanish. To summarize the many answers I received, within a particular dialect they are homophonous. There is variation between dialects, however. Northern Spain: a velar fricative, [x] in IPA notation. Southern Spain and much of Spanish America: pharyngeal fricative [h] similar to 'h' in English home Others (e.g. Chile): complementary distribution between two allophones of /x/: (1) palatized fricative [c,] before a [+front] vowel (2) otherwise a velar fricative [x]. Thanks for the answers! Steve Houchen shhoucheMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefirebird.aud.alcatel.com