Editor for this issue: <>
I don't think anyone has mentioned that for many speakers from New York City and the vicinity the two words spelled "can" are pronounced differently when both are stressed. In "I CAN peaches, I don't bottle them" the vowel of CAN is a mid-front vowel ending in a central off-glide [eMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue], while in "I CAN read French, I just don't like to" CAN is not diphthongal at all: it is a steady low-front vowel [ae]. "Can't" [ke
n?] has the vowel of the former "can" (can peaches) and not the vowel of "can" 'able'. Though people are sometimes uncertain as to whether they've heard "can" or "can't", especially when talking with someone whose dialect is different, the difference between the two vowels (or the two CANs) is phonemic, as we used to say. Some speakers from this area when self-conscious tend to hypercorrect, monophthongizing all [e
] diphthongs to [ae]; this adds to the possibilities for confusion. Bob Hoberman rhoberman
ccmail.sunysb.edu
Like others, I also helpfully encouraged the original poster to watch for those glottal stops as a signal that the word intended is "can'T" rather than "can". (Good luck hearing them!) Look into the negations of other auxiliaries, too. I recorded participants in an experiment negating past-tense verbs, gathering from many a litany of [dIn? wak], [dIn? iyt], etc. (those [I]'s are nasalized, but I don't know how to show that. In fact, there may be no dental/alveolar closure to [n] at all, but just the nasalized vowel followed by the glottal stop.) There is of course zero chance of confusion for even the nonnative speaker between "did" and "didn't", since the nasalization is a dead giveaway even if the glottalization is hard to hear. I'd bet money on the [dIn?]-sayers also producing [won?] for "won't" and making "wouldn't", "couldn't", "shouldn't" similarly monosyllabic. Anne LoringMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I'm not sure what the problem is about the pronunciation of 'can' versus can't. Anyone who comes from a place where they don't talk funny knows that the affirmative form rhymes with 'pin' and the negative with 'paint' Ki semenat ispinaza, non andet iskultsu! J. A. Rea jareaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueukcc.uky.edu