Editor for this issue: <>
State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11794-3355 Robert Hoberman Comparative Studies Dept. 516-632-7462, -7460 28-Sep-1993 10:55am EDT I'm going to be teaching a course on "Language and Life in the Middle East" for linguistics majors and non-majors. I would be grateful for suggestions of bibliography on the subject (especially more recent items), both sources for me and readings to assign the students. By "language and life" I mean language in relation to society, culture, history, and politics, with topics including social varieties, status and attitutes, language policies, cultural patterns reflected in language use, language contact, writing systems, literacy, etc. Include in the "Middle East" are Morocco, Turkey, Iran, and countries in between (haven't decided about Ethiopia and Somalia), including not only the national languages Arabic, Turkish, Persian, and Hebrew but also minority languages such as Berber, Kurdish, and Aramaic. Please send your suggestions directly to me. I will compile a list and gladly send a copy to anyone who asks. Bob Hoberman rhobermanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueccmail.sunysb.edu rhoberman
sbccmail.bitnet
Dear Linguists I am a sociolinguist working in the area of code-switching/mixing. I would appreciate any references which anyone may have on this topic. In particular, I am interested in the functions of code-switching/mixing. Please direct all replies to the address below. Thanks Mahendra K Verma Lecturer in Linguistics and Hindi University of York, UK mkv1Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuevax.york.ac.uk
Fellow Linguists, Does anyone know of any studies that have confirmed Ellen Bouchard Ryan and Richard J. Sebastian's 1980 study entitled, "The effects of speech style and social class background on social judgements of speakers," in which they concluded, " . . . accent does not matter as much for individuals known to be from the middle class"? Please either reply here or to me at gmikelMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesilver.ucs.indiana.edu. Thanks, Gina Mikel Petrie
I have a student in my phonology class wanted to research "Sign Lang. Phonology." I know that this term is used in sign lang. studies, and that the term 'phoneme' is used for the antiquated 'chereme'. What I am interested in is the fact that for most linguists, I think, phonology somehow IMPLIES sound (yes, phonemes, etc., are ABSTRACT fictions, and so on). Why and how did phonology come to take on the meaning that it clearly has in sign language studies? Do other linguists agree that phonology deals with the sound system(s) of language(s) to the unitiated linguists out there? How can the sign language experts justify (in any sense of the term) using phonology for cherology (the minimum distinct level in sign languge(s))? I know there are many parallels between ORAL phonology and SIGN LG. phonology. What I do not comprehend is why 'cherology' is not used for the well-established term 'phonology'. Also, what are other lang- uages doing here (Spanish, French, German, Russian, etc.)? Alan Kaye Linguistics CSU, Fullerton Fullerton, CA 92634 akayeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefullerton.edu