Editor for this issue: <>
I am a first-year graduate student in cultural anthropology and am looking for a field school taking place this summer where I can learn research methods in c ultural or linguistic anthropology and work on a project under supervision of a professional anthropologist. My particular interest is in the sociolinguistics of the Provence region of France (e.g., looking at the use of French vs. Occit an languages). Any suggestions/recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Roberta Chase BorgattiMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Has there been any computational implementations and/or use of Jackendoff's Semantic Structures in NLP applications? Any information or comments on such implementations would be appreciated. Thanks Kemal Oflazer Bilkent University Computer Engineering Department Bilkent, ANKARA, 06533 TURKIYE e-mail: koMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuetrbilun.bitnet fax: (90) 4 - 266-4126 (90) 4 - 266-4127 tel: (90) 4 - 266-4133 (90) 4 - 266-4000/1258
Dear Linguists, I am looking for studies of intra-sentential code-switching (or code-mixing) in Chinese languages, especially in Mandarin and Taiwanese. Any references will be greatly appreciated. Vincent Su NTNU144Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueTWNMOE10
Does anybody know of examples of either unbalanced coordination (as in (i)) or extraordinary balanced coordination (as in (2)) in any language? I am collecting data on these kinds of coordination for my PhD thesis, and I have data from 20-30 languages so far, but more would be welcome. (i) Mary was sitting between him and I What is unusual in unbalanced coordination is that one of the conjuncts does not have the grammatical properties that we expect in that position. In (i), the second conjunct has nominative case, which is unexpected in object position. Other features that might be subject to unbalancedness are e.g.tense, aspect, person, and number. (The latter two only if there is some agreement-marking elsewhere which obviously takes only one of the conjuncts into account.) Serial verbs might be concidered in these terms, too. It is important that the opposite order of the same conjuncts would be unacceptable or much worse, i.e.: A & B, vs. * B and A. I am only interested in morpho-syntactic unbalancedness, not in the semantic-pragmatic type of "drink the poison & die". (ii) Him and her were always good friends What is unusal in extraordinary balanced coordination is that, although the conjuncts have the same grammatical features, these features are unexpected in this position. In (ii), both conjuncts have accusative case, but the expected case would be nominative. The deviant feature(s) is only possible because the phrase is coordinated, i.e. A & B, B & A, vs. *A, *B. I would welcome data from any language or language variety (the phenomenon is more prevalent in substandard varieties in some languages). Please include, if you can, information on whether this is a widespread or marginal phenomenon in the language (-variety), and where the language(-variety) is spoken. If possible, examples from a written source with references is preferred, but I am of course interested in any other examples, too. For those interested, I can compile a list of the answers. Janne Johannessen, University of Oslo.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue