Editor for this issue: <>
Is it a call for papers ? Of course, this is not a correct question as it stands. But why isn't it? What's wrong with it? Why are you so tempted to change it in this? If you think there is something missing here, what is? And why does Is this a call for papers seem a complete utterance? Anaphors like it and this are not the empty words some authors seem to believe they are. They create expectations of coherence and effects of incoherence when they are not correctly used. These observations suggest a series of questions : - What are anaphors? - Is there a difference between anaphora and deixis? - What exactly is the distinction between syntactically bound and discourse anaphors? - What is the linguistic meaning of these anaphoric words? - Is there a distinction between this linguistic meaning and what enables them to identify a referent? - What is it then that enables them to create expectations and effects of (in)coherence? These and other questions will constitute the topic of the conference on ANAPHORIC RELATIONS AND (IN)COHERENCE which will be organised by the Belgian circle of linguistics, Travaux de linguistique at the University of Antwerp (UIA) from 1 to 3 december 1994. The conference will include lectures on the semantics and pragmatics of anaphors (nominal or temporal) in general and on their contrbution to the creation of (in) coherence in particular. Authors are requested to submit four copies of a one-page abstract before April 1, 1994 to Walter De Mulder and Liliane Tasmowski-De Ryck Anaphoric Relations and (in)coherence UIA - ROM Universiteitsplein 1 B-2610 Wilrijk Belgium.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue