Editor for this issue: <>
I am about to embark on a study of Computational Morphology [English language]. I would be interested to hear any opinions which may be out there concerning the relative merits of different approaches. I am especially interested in the building of morphological lexicons. I have been looking at Koskenniemi's two-level approach and the PC-KIMMO implementation of it. I also have the University of Pennsylvania morphological lexicon and X-based management tools. This is, to a large extent, based on the PC-KIMMO system. I would like to know what people think of the above systems and what alternative systems/models are available. Thanks in advance. Flann Horgan. ============================================================================ Flann Horgan <8805482Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueul.ie> Undergraduate, Department of Computer Science & Information Systems University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. ============================================================================
I had a query from a student about the meaning of a phrase attributed to Roman Jakobson. Can anyone tell me the translation, and anything regading the accuracy of the attribution? "Linguista sum: linguistici nihil a me alienum puto." Becky PassonneauMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Hello -- Does anyone know of e-mail address of 'Hans-J|rgen Sasse'? He published two papers on Galab (Geleb or Dasenech, a Cushtic language spoken in Ethiopia according to his description) in the early seventies. Any information about him, or any other published/unpublished source of Galab, would be very appreciated. Please reply to 'hongshMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueccit.arizona.edu'. Thanks a lot. hong
Does there exist a MAC search program which has the following features necessary for the study of natural conversations? -- can work on any ASCII text. -- preserves the source text format, i.e. does not line up the target forms in a column unlike keyword-in-context concordances. -- allows some option in window size for the number of lines above and below the target form which will be retained in the result file to allow context analysis. -- allows an option in restricting or not the upper or lower case of the target form, or in reading or overlooking the diacritics or punctuation in a search. -- allows the option of searching for discontinuous patterns, e.g. `look X up' could be retrieved with `look up' . Susan Ervin-Tripp Psychology University of California, BerkeleyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue