Editor for this issue: <>
Questions of E-mail as "speech" and "writing errors" again raises a topic I have been working on for a while--errors in creative (non-copying) typing. Many of my examples come from E-mail messages--others from my own and students' writing. In brief, these are a species of error MUCH less like normal speech errors and much more like speech in so-called agrammatic aphasia. These errors include loss of inflections and function words, substituting more common for less common forms, and a general reduction in length. Obviously these are not independent of one another. Just like in the speech error data, there are some serious production/collection bias problems here. Just like the agrammatical cases, it is not easy to distinguish substitution from omission in many cases. Do these data inform us at all about the writing process? They certainly don't do anything for theories of agrammatism based on loss of linguistic structure! Below are summary tables of these data. Any comments and new examples would be appreciated. John Limber, Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham NH USA Table 1 Examples of typing errors (Substitutions and/or omissions) ______________________________________________________________________________ Error type Example ______________________________________________________________________________ contraction I* like a copy. modifier I unexpected* spent a day.. nominal This can be seen by first look* at the F-values verbal the ownership of the red hat is not know*. omit they all [*have] the familiar "graceful degradation" properties. substitution ..there will be a file in your direction*.[directory] reduplication ..that you are writing this as a guide to* to your presentationMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I am in need of a brief consultation with one or more linguists who know Mandarin Chinese, with regard to some evaluation I need to do (whose details I cannot post publicly). I'd like to hear from anyone who can give me some very brief assistance by email. The most relevant area of linguistics is syntax, but detailed knowledge of any particular linguistic theory is not needed. Thanks. -- < Michael A. Covington, Assc Rsch Scientist, Artificial Intelligence Programs > < The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606-7415 USA mcovingtMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueai.uga.edu >
I'm interested in finding information on children's speech, with a particular focus on gender. Specifically, what work been done on investigating how a child's gender could possibly affect his/her usage of language and the structure of his/her conversations. I'm looking for anything - books, articles, empirical or theoretical, and cross-linguistic - to give me a better idea of what's out there so that I can focus my thoughts on this issue. Thanks, Ashley Williams awilliamMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuereed.edu