Editor for this issue: <>
>From: "Philip Johnson-Laird" <philMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueclarity.Princeton.EDU> >Subject: Re: 5.1011 Sum: The teaching of syntax >VERY interesting! >P I'm glad someone found it interesting. I found it tendentious and misleading. As usual, the view of linguistics (and now linguistics teaching) presented in the context of a LINGUIST polemic bears little relation to the field as it can be seen in real life -- for example, in the pages of its journals or in the conference halls and hallway chatter of meetings. I have no time (this time) for a reply on the subject of how GB teaching prevents students from looking for patterns in data, because I'm too busy pondering the implications of a recent class presentation by one of our students on the syntactic implications of the stress patterns of the Old Irish verbal system -- and then I need to get to reading another student's latest attempt to figure out what's really going on with Papago extraposition. Careful thinking about the recalcitrant data requires too much of my attention to adequately answer the latest posting about the inadequate respect of "GB" people for facts. Sorry. -David Pesetsky