Editor for this issue: <>
[Moderators' note: As most of you know, we usually don't post job requests, but we consider this to be an exception.] Prof. dr Milan Sipka of the University of Sarajevo is seeking a temporary full-time or part-time research or teaching position in the U.S. or Canada. He could teach the Serbo-Croatian language, its structure, history or sociolinguistics. He wishes to spend some time in North America in order to gather information for the North American segment of his project Encyclopedic Lexicon of South Slavonic Linguistic Studies. This reference work promises to have even greater value for the development of the South Slavic field now than when it was planned in the 1980s. Prof. Sipka's curriculum vitae and bibliography, as well as details about the Encyclopedic Lexicon, are available from him c/o Gerhard Neweklowsky at the address gerhard.neweklowskyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuni-klu.ac.at until the end of November 1994. Wayles Browne, Assoc. Prof. of Linguistics Dept. of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Morrill Hall Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853, U.S.A. tel. 607-255-0712, 607-273-3009 e-mail ewb2
cornell.edu (earlier: jn5j
cornella.bitnet // jn5j
cornella.cit.cornell.edu)
Before posing my problem, let me first express my feeling about the most exciting possibilities that LINGUIST has opened to me, after being in the cold for so long in South Africa. It is just unbelievably stimulating to get reactions from all over the world within days. My problem as a new user: How do one refer to such reactions in a scientific publication? Merely: "personal communication"? Or something more "official", such as (in the text): "The general idea is that the human vocal tract has inherent limitations (such as the relative difficulty of heterogeous voicing specifications within a consonant cluster), and that ..." (Nathan, LINGUIST E-MAIL, Oct. 10, 1994) Should one possibly refer to the number as well? And what about the list of references? Thanks very much to whose persons who have, up till now, reacted: Laurie Bauer Kurt Blaylock Don Churma Alex Eulenberg Anna Fenyvesi George Fowler Philip Hamilton Thomas Klein Geoffrey Nathan Carsten Peust Giorgio Perissinotto Marc Picard Alexis Ramer Charles Scott Hadass Sheffer I will react to each of them individually a.s.a.p., and will post the findings to LINGUIST, as requested be some of you. SOME GENERAL SUGGESTIONS / OBSERVATIONS: * Please mention your discipline, affiliation and country when reacting. Particularly in the present case: only 5 of you have done it. In a light vein: * It would be a very interesting venture to study the personality traits of e-mail list users such as those of LINGUIST: I would guess that they are generally speaking constructive thinkers, and more in particular: problem solving orienated, open-minded, helpful (obviously), curious, etc. (and, perhaps, on the negative side, attention-craving!!) It might be that such persons are more introvertive - but this, especially, is a wild guess, I am definitely no psychologist. Daan Wissing Dept. of Linguistics Univ. of Potchefstroom Rep. of South Africa atldpwMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuepuknet.puk.ac.za
I want any favor such as giving an idea about lexical item access, retrival, the relation of "FRAME" and key-word set(lexical entry) of a certain textual part. I have a belief that there must be a mirco-analysis on the relation between lexicon set and the construction of FRAME OR THEMATIC CONFIGURATION happening in every course of discourse understanding. To my sorrow, I have few papers dealing with this problem concretely in view of linguistics. So please give me some of your thought or if possible, send me some of papers of yours or others.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I have been enjoying the discussion of the term "linguist" over the past few weeks and wonder if similar ambiguity and multiple usage of the term used to refer to professionals who teach linguistics,and/or do research in language(s) occur in other languages as well. I am interested in collecting information from those who know what terms are used in the languages they are familiar with and if there are any discrepancies between the popular and technical usages of those terms. Who knows. Maybe we can learn something from others. Anyone who cares to contribute to this cross-linguistic database is welcome to write to: enidMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.edu I will report to the list after receiving a fair amount of responses. Enid Mok Dept. of Linguistics Univ. of Hawaii 1890 East West Rd. Moore 569 Hon.HI 96822