Editor for this issue: <>
In reference to the excellent review of "linguistics and the notion of science" I would like to point out one small inaccuracy. At the end of the post there is a quote from a Beatles song, *Fool on the Hill*. While this is credited solely to John Lennon, the song was actually written by Paul McCartney (Paul can be seen singing the song in one of the first "rock videos" ever made in the film *Magical Mystery Tour*). Although Lennon and McCartney throughout the Beatles career-span shared songwriter credits, they stopped active collaboration (with some exceptions such as *A Day in the Life*) since about 1965. What does this trivia have to do with linguistics? Well, the music of the Beatles and the language they used, have influenced millions of people the world over. As a young boy growing up in India I fell in love with their music which helped me considerably in both learning the English language and appreciating western culture. Those linguists who are interested in acculturation (are there any on this list? please contact me at the email addres below) could study global influences like the prevalence of fiction novels, hollywoood movies, TV (CNN), and pop music to account for the spread of the English language in other cultures. Since the study of culture and language go hand in hand, linguistics necessarily is a multidisciplinary field that would have to include sociological, historical, and psychological approaches. To coin a phrase that sums it up (with apologies to Albert Einstein): Cultural studies that ignore language are lame, and linguistics that ignores culture is blind Hemant Desai Univ of Nebraska-Lincoln Email: hdesaiMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueunl.edu