Editor for this issue: <>
Moderators' Note In the interests of a balanced exchange of views, we publish the following reply to a posting by Sheila Embleton, an editor of Diachronica. Interchanges of this nature, however, are best carried out in forums other than LINGUIST, and this will thus be our last posting on the topic. ********************* I am not sure why Sheila Embleton chose to attack me on LINGUIST but briefly *Diachronica* has accepted for publication a paper in which I am attacked personally--and basically described as an idiot--on the basis of remarks I made (or am alleged to have made) during oral discussion at a conference in Ypsilanti last year. I have repeatedly told the author of the paper as well as the editors of *Diachronica* that I consider this a rather dubious form of scholarship: I think people should be criticized on the basis of published statements, not oral remarks which cannot be checked for accuracy. Moreover, criticizing in print remarks made at a conference during discussions is bound to have a chilling effect on such discussions. *Diachronica* chose to disagree, and when I asked for an opportunity to respond to these attacks, I was told that they would not only not accept any rebuttal from me, they would not even CONSIDER one by me (or even a coauthored one by me and others), and that furthermore they would not consider any submissions from me whatsoever for a period of at least 2 years. I have no objections to journals which have a policy of not allowing replies or which have a policy of limiting the number of publications by the same person, but in this case no existing policy was cited. As far as I can tell, some of the folks at *Diachronica* just decided they don't like me anymore. Which still does not mean that they have the right to publish stuff that comes to close to being slanderous or, I think, to refuse people who have been maligned in print the right to reply (however briefly). Alexis Manaster RamerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue