Editor for this issue: <>
I'm looking for references on the topic: register and/or genre in the pre-school age. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Please reply directly to me at: caroline.libergMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueling.uu.se If anyone is interested, I will post a list of the references I find. Thanks in advance, Caroline Liberg Caroline Liberg Dept of Linguistics, Uppsala university Box 513, S-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden fax: +46 18 181416 tel: +46 18 181344 e-mail: caroline.liberg
ling.uu.se
Hello, I need a word frecuency list in spanish, and I would like to know where can I get it. Mostly I am interested in words related to the cientific field. If you know where can I get it, please let me know. Pablo Accuosto Facultad de Ingenieria Universidad de la Republica Montevideo - Uruguay e-mail: accuostoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefing.edu.uy
A student is examining the variation in pronunciation of /r/ of Thai students of German, in different speech styles (conversation, reading, minimal pairs). We would appreciate any information or references relating to variation of /r/ of German native speakers, allophonic, dialectal, or stylistic. Mr. Gwyn Williams \_ * Department of Linguistics (/ * * Thammasat University /) Bangkok 10200, Thailand (/ * (gwynMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueipied.tu.ac.th) '
In reading a recent book on English phonology, I discovered that I had misunderstood (or overlooked) some recent proposals in syllable theory. The author of this book defines a syllabification algorithm that breaks syllables at troughs of sonority, the peaks of course being parsed as the syllable nuclei. In case of ambiguity, the onset wins (intervocalic consonants get parsed as the onset of the following syllable, not the coda of the preceding syllable; except that under certain circumstances such a C can be ambisyllabic). The problem arises with a sequence like sCV or sCCV, where the first C is a stop. The 's' is presumably of higher sonority than the stop. The author says that the 's' is parsed into an appendix of the syllable, preceding the onset. (The idea of syllable appendicies is attributed to an article by Fujimura in 1979. Hooper, in her Natural Generative Phonology, said that such /s/s in English were syllabic, a claim which I haven't seen anyone else buy into.) At first glance, syllable appendices seems to be a name for a problem, rather than a solution. On the other hand, I have read elsewhere about word-level appendices, and there seems to be some independent evidence for them (particularly in languages like Bella Coola, where the appendices are truly gigantic, but are evidently ignored by morphology that makes reference to the first syllable of the stem). Is there independent evidence for appendices to syllables? The same author also takes post-coda sequences of "coronal obstruents" to be appendices at the syllable level. I would have thought these, at least, were candidates for word-level appendices, as I can't think of word-internal examples (apart from compound nouns, which might be different); I'm assuming in a word like "constraint", the syllabification is "con.straint" (evidently syllable-initial appendices win over syllable-final appendices, too). Is there evidence one way or the other?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue