Editor for this issue: <>
Many readers of LINGUIST (and of LANGUAGE) are, as the open letter indicates, interested in methodological issues that come up in efforts to establish very distant linguistic relationships like Nostratic. Although it's true that LANGUAGE has published no review of Illich-Svitych's books -- the scholar who agreed to review them has not yet submitted the promised review -- research in the same tradition has been reviewed in the journal: see Bernard Comrie's review of Starostin's book on Altaic and Japanese in LANGUAGE 69:828-832 (1993). The methodological issues involved in the Altaic & Japanese case are the same as the issues involved in the Nostratic case, so I'm puzzled by the open-letter signers' apparent belief that the Russian approach to these issues has received no attention in LANGUAGE. Sarah Thomason Editor, LANGUAGEMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue