Editor for this issue: <>
I recently posted a query regarding Zellig Harris's treatment of word order. While none of the replies received answered the question, I would like to thank all those kind souls who wrote in to suggest that I reread Harris's whole corpus of syntactic descriptions. I should also say that once again LINGUIST generated an amazing response, in this case a person who perhaps would not like to be named publicly actually offered to give me her copy of one of the collections of Harris's papers. As to the question, having reread a lot of Harris, I very slowly realized that his treatments of both syntax and morphology in the form of explicit formulae did NOT handle word order AT ALL. They were intended to capture the facts of permissible morpheme sequences without paying attention to the actual order of the morphemes and morpheme sequences. I am not sure that he was really consistent in this, but that's apparently what he was doing. This is, of course, why there seems to be no discussion of free word order. I should add that this only applies to work published before 1956, which is the only work I was interested in (stuff done before the birth of TG). I have not checked to see what he did later. It may be of interest to note that other American linguists working within the same tradition as Harris (Bloomfield, Bloch, etc.) did explicitly talk about both fixed and free word order, but they, unlike Harris, did not provide explicit formulae for syntactic constructions.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue