Editor for this issue: <>
Hello I would be delighted if anyone proficient in Old English verb structure and GB theory would comment on the following diachronic interpretation. First, there is the following historical movement (where strong Gmc preterites shifted to the precursors of contemporary modal verbs about 1500 years ago, viz., new preterites with weak endings): OLD Infinitive | Present | Present | Pret Sg | Pret Pl to avail *deogan | 3P sg | 3P pl | deag | dugon to know | | | cuthe | cunnon to be able *magan | | | meahge | magon to be obligated *sceolan | | | sceal | sculon ----<-----<-----/ / / ===================== -----<---/---<-----<-----<-------/ / NEW Infinitive / / ---<----<----<--/ / / / to avail dugan | deag | dugon | to know cunnan | can | cunnon | to be able magan | maeg | magon | to be obligated sculan | sceal | sculon | (Adapted from Bright's OE Grammar and Reader, Cassidy & Ringler, 1971.) The old plural preterite provides a new third person plural and a new infinitive. Old past singular provides a new third person singular. (Please freely correct me on any errors in my terrible Old English.) After additional morphological simplification, I assume that this process uncontroversially provides some of our contemporary modals. Since something special needs to be said about modal verbs, could it be useful to view the resulting syntactic and semantic structure as: 1. compounding both finite TNS (past or present) and INFLo into modals? (INFLo perhaps dominates the finite tense component such that modals have different pragmatic (or sometimes no) rules about tense usage? Moreover, double modals are possible in some dialects.); 2. seen as vaguely parallel formations with encliticizations such as HAFTA, GONNA, WANNA, GOTTA, OUGHTA, et al. (which are blocked from orthographic adoption by 'literacy' and spelling prescriptions)?; 3. persuasive that some functional 'embedding' of INFLo, i.e. the 'syntactic referent' of INF TO, is the 'modality operator' that evokes atemporality or tenselessness within the modal complement? (Periphrastic substitutions for modals explicitly use INF TO.) Please email me with any criticisms or references you think relevant. I will summarize back to the list if there is interest. Ken Hughes..........Science Education, UBC.........hughesMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueunixg.ubc.ca 2125 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver B.C. V6T 1Z5 [Thesis on phenomenological interpretations of language constructions]
As a member of a research group on SOV Languages I would like to get into contact with (a) linguist(s) who is/are familiar with the Kashmiri language (spoken in India). >From the literature I have gathered that Kashmiri is considered to be an SOV language with Verb Second. Therefore, Kashmiri should be comparable to German and Dutch. In particular I would like to know if Kashmiri has constructions with more than one auxiliary per sentence, how infinitives behave and if Kashmiri has extraposition. If you're willing to answer questions about Kashmiri, please mail. Dr. J. Rutten, Dept. of General Linguistics, Utrecht University, Holland mail ruttenMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelet.ruu.nl
I'm doing work on English gerunds and would appreciate recent references on the topic. Thanks in advance, Fiona Fay, University College, Dublin.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Thanks to those ppl who replied to my recent request for assistance translating some Swahili, it was gratefully recieved and acknowledged. I have finished the essay and handed it in, any further comment on my grasp of the subject is left to my lecturers... :-) And now... another request for help, this time in tracing a reference. I have found a nice article I wish to use in my final Linguistics Paper but have very little in the way of reference to acknowledge it in my bibliography. If anyone can help with the date of publication and publisher, please email me. The article in question is: William SCHWAB and Asae SHICHI, Picking up on cultural subtleties: the cocktail party as teacher for the Japanese. Thanks in anticipation, Lindsay Endell lie1Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueunix.york.ac.uk.