Editor for this issue: <>
I have been followingthe discussion on accents with more than my usual interest. I have some observations to make and a request. I'll make the request first, andthen go on to the observations. The request is: can anybody out there tell me how I can subscribe to the American Speech network on which this particular topic started? Observations: first that stereotypes of accents are distinct from accents, regardless of whether the stereotypers have the accents or not. This is relevant to all portrayals of accents by actors etc, where the actors box office drawing power is of more concern to producers than their ability to do "authentic" accents of whatever type is needed. It is also relevant to Cokie Roberts "joke" about unintelligible Mississippi accents, if I got the areal reference right. Sure, Cokie has a discernible but underplayed Southern accent of an educated type, approporiate to her profession -- but that doesnt mean that her comment does not reflect a smugness which may accomodate to her "sophisticated" Washington DC milieu, or have a class basis among educated Southerners. So while it's worth observing that she is Southern, as many postings have done, that does not mean that it is not a reflection of the same prejudice which is acknowledged when coming froma "Northern" mouth/pen -- and then I have allowed that it may also be a more local class-accent prejudice among Southerners, but I think she was playing to the general American audience to whom she addressed her remark as a witticism. Northern prejudice of the Southern accent, and stereotyping it with undesirabl e but particularly "country" and "ignorant" characteristics has a long history, but I think it reached its height of unpopularity as "dangerous" "racist" and "evil" in the films of the 1960s, starting with "Easy Rider". There is also a sexual split, so that I have heard many Northerners say they hate the Southern accent in a MAN, but find it charming in a WOMAN -- and come to think of it, I can't think of any MALE Southern actors with the success of female Southerners like Holly Hunter (but there are not many like her either in Hollywood, does Cissy Spacek, how do you spell it? count?) Stemberger had asked about whether North American accents had been radically altered by immigrants -- implying some substratal phenomena. Actually, when I first read his question, I thought of Northern US accents, in the context of Southern US accents -- although I realised that is not what he meant. But I already had some thoughts about that, so I thought I would mention them. To begin with, a concept which became popular among the creolists in arguing with the dialectologists about the origin of Black Englis h is very disagreeable to many white Southerners and contradicts their own myths about their varieties of English. This was that SouthernUS English in general was (largely?) shaped by the African population and their descendents, this was in the context of arguments about the African and/or creole origin of various BE features like double modals, invariant be, etc etc, to which the dialectologists, like McDavid, a Southerner, said whites had them too, as if precluding a creole/African origin -- to which then the creolists came back with the argument I just mentioned. For example, Dillard cites a British traveler in the late 18th c who had the impression that Southerners who did not go to Northern or British schools to learn how to speak "properly ", which included many of the "ladies" even in adulthood, spoke like their Black servants. Features were not given, but that's not the point. From the age of this particular document I imagined, but have not done all the research, that the argument is actually an old one, and one which Northerners were in more overtly racist times able to taunt white Southerners about their accents. With that in mind, I read into the following passages of one of the usual popularising stereotyped accents books, in this case, Dian Eaton's "Is it true what they say about Dixie?" (Secaucus,NJ: Citadel Press, 1988) a loving treatment, and informative, but no less stereotyping for that: Quote 1: The Southern population has grown by natural increase rather than by the waves of immigration that swept the more industrial North. Therefore, the same principal population divisions as the original settlers have pretty well been maintained: the Anglo-Saxons, the Scotch-Irish, the Germans, French , Spanish, Mexicans, and the Africans. (p.3) Quote 2: The Southern dialect is not really Southern at all, but the Queen's English of the time of Queen Elizabeth I, Shakespeare, Marlowe... if Shakespeare were to travel into the remote regions of North Carolina today, into the coves and hollows of the Blue Ridge and Great Smoky Mountains, he would find highlanders conversing in his own pure mother tongue (although heavily accented), and he would have no difficulty in fitting in (p.8) Quote 2 is of course a familiar version of the myth of Appalachian speech (rather than Lowland Southern varieties). Although the two quotes are pages apart I read them together as a subtext in response to the Northern "taunt" that they speak like "Africans". The retort is: not at all, we speak "real" English, the way it was spoken in England when WE left. On the other hand, you Northerners speak a jargon corrupted by your many waves of immigrants who have overwhelmed your original "Anglo-Saxons" -- listen to the way you talk -- isn;'t that enough proof? So much for that, because all this stuff is pretty naive and simplistic as linguistics, but it's very interesting and important as a reflection of American society and the continuing rift for whatever current reasons between the North and the South. My next thought has to do with the apparent fact that Southerners are much more disturbed and resentful of the misportrayal of their accents in the media than are, say, New Yorkers, who seem almost obtuse to itsimplications,True enough, New York stereotypes are widely romanticised as glamorous or at least cunning gangsters, preferrable to the violent, racist, nasty stereotypes of Southerners. But still...? Well, it seems to me that New Yorkers are able to laugh off the stereotypes, or even accept them, as applying to some "other" New Yorkers. Southerners seem more communal in taking offense, because of the longstanding historical hostility. Some examples of New Yorkers accepting the stereotypes, Mae West in "She Donna Him Wrong" (193something) She's an authentic "oi" speaker, like a lot of New York performers of the time, e.g., Groucho Marx. Of course, "oi" is not pronounced "oi" except in the stereotype. In one scene, someone else use the stereotype,"I'm noivous" (it's a showgirl before the show where Mae West sings at her nightclub) -- the stereotype is used by someone who is not really a New Yorker. Mae West repeats her pronunciation of "noivous" mocking it "don't be noivous", as if unaware that the stereotype stems from a New York pronunciation like her own, never commented on by anyone in any of her films. That is, the stereotype became the written "oi", not the actually pronunciation. Later 1930s "Dead End" or whatever with Humphrey Bogart Sylvia Sydney and those Dead End Kids, Muggsy n them. Bogart is a real New Yorker, but of a relatively elevated class, prep school and all that. In the film he is a gangster returning to the hood. He has a phoney "oi" stereotype which comes up often, and contrasts like night and day with the authentic pronunciation of some of the street kids (that is the actors who portray them and do not have to phoney up this particular aspect of their character accents). In the late 1960s I found that New Yorkers I asked were deaf to the phoniness of Dustin Hoffman's accent in "Midnight Cowboy" portraying the New York City slimeball Rizzo. Actually he was quite good, but his dream was to go to "FLOOR-ida" that is "Florida" with the vowel of "floor" rather than "far", a feature of his native LA accent, common in the US outside of the East Coast, but alien to New York City or much of the East Coast. More recently I saw some movie where Jessica Lange plays a New Yorker opposite Robert DiNiro (a 199something movie) I forgot the title. Her accent is amusing and much less competent than Hoffman's. Particularly striking was that in the film DiNiro was "Harry", but she was incapable of calling him anything but "Hairy". Again, that's typical of American accents apart from the East Coast, but short a and "ay" are distinguished before r in open syllables in New York, just as short "o" as in Florida, forest, orang e, etc etc is distinguished from long "o" in the same environment. These aspects of pronunciation are almost impossible for people whose authentic accents have suffered the mergers to get right. So pop the films into your VCRs and check out what I have said. Getting back to the main point, New Yorkers are not upset by these mis- portrayals of their accent the way Southerners are, and I have already suggested that this has to do with the stereotyped character of the people associated with the (stereotyped) accents, and how the stream of history compels people who are the target of different stereotypes to take the stereotypes more or less personally, fearing -- with good reason, I think -- that the stereotypes are poisoning people's minds in a way that will be to their personal disadvantage. In closing, I want to encourage more talk about stereotypes, their relation to linguistic reality, and whether it is excusable for targets of stereotypes to play to the stereotypes, as seems to have been suggested, I think naively, in the case of Cokie Roberts. But I also think the irate Southerners should also discuss THEIR stereotypes of each other and other people, and discuss that too. Stereotypes will always be with us for comic effect, I think, although I'm not quite sure why it is universal to laugh at other people's speech. BenjiMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue