Editor for this issue: <>
A couple weeks ago I posted a query asking for references concerning the deictics, "this" and "that." Here is a summary of responses. Thanks to all who responded. Heidi Shetzer hshetzerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuxa.cso.uiuc.edu Division of English as an International Language University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 3070 Foreign Languages Building 707 S. Mathews Ave. Urbana, IL 61801 ______________________________________________________________________________ Joachim Knuf (jknuf
ukcc.uky.edu) passed along conference info: TIME, SPACE, AND IDENTITY The First International Colloquium on Deixis December 2-4, 1994 College of Communications and Information Studies University of Kentucky submission deadline May 30, 1994 email listserv for conference has been set up: "if your local host does not support the Rtells command, mail the message Rsub deixis firstname lastnames to listserv
ukcc.uky,edu to receive conference mailings" ______________________________________________________________________________ references/other responses--no particular order: Webber, B. ( May 1991) "Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis." Natural Language and Cognitive Processes 6(2),107-135. (This/That in a comp. linguistics framework) Di Eugenio, B. (1989) "Clausal reference in {I}talian" Proceedings Penn Linguistics Colloquium. Ariel, M. (1990) Accessing NP Antecedents. Routledge. (discusses this/that, and mentions other works) Garcia, E.C. (year?) "A Psycho-linguistic Crossroads: Frequency of Use." Journal of Semantics 7, 301-319. (Henny Klein klein
let.rug.nl) notes: "he/she argues that the choice for a linguistic expression is related to the cognitive category it belongs to..." Lackoff, R. (1974). Remarks on "this" and "that". In M.W. Lagaly, R. A. Fox, and A. Bruck (eds.), Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society. 345-356. Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society. Maclaran, R. (1980). On two asymmetrical uses of the demonstrative determiners in English. Linguistics, 18 (9-10), 803-820. Johannes Heinecke (heinecke
compling.hu-berlin.de) recommends: B"uhler, Karl. (1934-2nd printing 1965) "Sprachtheorie" In German. Heinecke notes,"B"uhler tries to figure out a "origo" of all deictics..." & works by K. Heger (mainly written in German) from the 60s and 70s--these "concentrate on the underlying nature of deictics" Strauss, S. (1993) paper on "this", "that", and "it", in the proceedings from the annual conferences, Chicago Linguistic Society No. 29. & longer version--MA Thesis from the Dept of Applied Linguistics, UCLA. Romary, Laurent (romary
loria.fr) , part of a team interested in man-machine dialog, has "written a short paper on [the French] "ici", emphasizing the fact that it initiates a paving structure of space which is then possibly re-activated by a word like "l'" [Title unknown, in French]. & Romary has also written a paper which appeared in the French Journal "Languages"--presented at a workshop on Time, Space and Movement. Paper explains the teams methodology concerning referring expressions.[title unknown] Additionally David Lee (dalee
lingua.cltr.uq.ox.au) notes that Jenny Cheshire at Neuchatel, Switzerland is working on a manuscript on the socio-aspects of "that" (cheshire
lettres.unine.ch) Finally, David Denison (d.denison
man.ac.uk) posed an interesting question: "Why, when responding to an unfamiliar voice on the phone, do Americans typically say 'who is this?', British people [always?] 'who is that?'" any takers?