Editor for this issue: <>
Recently there has been a query on the list concerning Chinese software for the MAC. I am very interested in also knowing what software is available for PC. If this issue has not been on the list before, I will, of course, put a summary on the list of all the information received. Thank you Marta Carulla Facultat de Traduccio Universitat Pompeu Fabra e-mail: carullaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueupf.es
Could anybody recommend some books--or survey or other important articles--on the topic of language acquisition from a cross-linguistic perspective. That is, I am after the question of the extent to which the language being learned influences the way that the learning itself takes place. To put this in context, I am looking for arguments for the view that language is largely the way it is because of the way it was before, i.e., that the language learner is heavily weighed down by the burden of history. This is intended, among other things, to explain drift and such remarkable facts as the persistence of the same basic types of syntax in large groups of genetically related languages (e.g., Western Austronesian). Please send replies to me and I will post a summary.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I am wondering if anybody knows of any explanations that have proposed--or have any ideas--regarding the following apparent contradictions implicit in some widely held ideas: (a) There is all that research that says that infants can hear all the possible adult phonological distinctions, even those which are irrelevant to the language they are exposed to, but it is also widely held that sound change arises because children do not learn all the adult distinction. Does this mean that children in some parts of the US could perfectly well hear the distinction between _cot_ and _caught_ but did not choose to make it and then lost the ability to hear it? And if so what is the age at which a child loses the ability to hear the distinctions which it has not acquired EVEN THOUGH adults in his/her community are making the distinction all the time? (b) Language change is supposed to be the same everywhere (since the laws of language are all the same for all humans), yet certain changes seem to occur only in certain areas (e.g., the development of rich tonal systems from consonantal distinctions). How is this explained? (c) Some features of a language are supposed to be marked and others unmarked. Why then are there features which appear to be marked in some languages and unmarked in others? I have in mind, for example, the click consonants? If they are unmarked, why are they no found all over the earth? And if they are marked, why are they so darn frequent in the languages in which they do occur?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
We have a small (one person, one year) grant to develop integrated linguistics teaching software for a mid-range Macintosh, and are keen to use existing Mac-based software as much as possible. We are aware of a fair amount of software already, but there is a lot out there---especially in-house productions that may not be widely known. I would be very grateful for information on software for teaching and learning in whatever area of linguistic study that we might be able to look at and consider for possible inclusion in a workbench for linguistics. This may be a FAQ, but I would like the information to be as up to date as possible, which is why I am asking again. There may be a lot of interest: we will willingly summarise to the net. We have some funds for buying in likely-looking software, so don"t hesitate to get in touch if you are selling some! We can also get things via gopher, ftp, mosaic, or whatever. Many thanks in advance Judy Delin, Lecturer in Language and Linguistics, University of Stirling Stirling FK9 4LA UK Tel +44 (0)786 467974, 466086Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue