Editor for this issue: <>
If you want to solve the misperception/ignorance of linguistics (and language) problem write COMPREHENSIBLE popular books. If you only have time for "serious" specialised work all you can do is write angry letters, and hope that if they are published they will be understood. Personally, I think the angry letter strategy is of limited impact. Better to start a linguistic fan club for ordinary readers. Who wants to be the Asimov of linguistics? Or SJ Gould? I think there is a certain snobbism in linguistics that disdains the desire to talk to the public (or is it an insecurity?), so that one who writes for a "popular" audience could fear being looked down upon and not taken seriously by colleagues. It's more complicated than that, but I don't want to go on at length here. I'd like to know whether and where this perception comes from, and/or if anyone agrees. My feeling is that linguists who don't want to "waste their time" talking to outsiders, shouldn't waste their time fretting over what outsiders think. BenjiMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue