Editor for this issue: <>
Someone has asked me for a compilation of English "adjectives of feeling" (angry, sad, lonely, puzzled...). I have not heard of such a list, but if anyone has, please let me know. The request is for adjectives specifically, rather than all such predicates. However, I could boil down a larger list. Ken Miner minerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuekuhub.cc.ukans.edu
In "numeral-classifier languages" such as Vietnamese and Mandarin, it is often claimed that the use of a numeral classifier is "obligatory" when a noun occurs in construction with a numeral. I am interested in knowing whether -- contrary to the above claim -- there may be certain contexts in which the classifier is in fact optional. One likely context is that of restaurants and cafes. In Vietnamese, when a waiter takes an order from a table and shouts it back to the kitchen, s/he will typically omit the classifier, eg. (diacritics omitted) [hai ga ba bo] "two chicken three beef" (at a noodle stall), or [hai ca-phe den mot nuoc cam] "two coffee black one water orange" (at a drinks stall). In contrast, in (the Singaporean dialect of) Mandarin, in similar contexts, it is my impression that the classifier is usually or always present, though, quite often, the numeral-plus-classifier expression will occur after the noun, rather than in its "canonical" position before it, eg. [kafei yi bei] "coffee one cup". My query is thus addressed to speakers of "numeral-classifier languages", or linguists living in communities of "numeral-classifier language" speakers. I would therefore like to hear from speakers of or persons familiar with Japanese, Korean, the various Chinese languages spoken in the PRC, ROC and Hong Kong, Khmer, Thai, Burmese, Nepali, or any other "numeral-classifier language". Specifically, I would like to know whether, in your language, there are contexts (such as restaurants and cafes) in which the numeral classifier can be omitted, as would appear to be the case in Vietnamese, or whether the numeral classifier must indeed always be present, as is perhaps the case in Singaporean Mandarin. I would also appreciate any theoretical comments on this issue, and speculation on what factors might underlie the apparent difference between Vietnamese and Mandarin (eg. maybe the numeral-plus- classifier constituent constitutes two words in Vietnamese but a single word in Mandarin). Thanks, David Gil ellgildMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuenusvm.bitnet PS I still owe the linguist list summaries on two previous classifier queries. I now plan to post a joint summary for all three classifier queries.
Dear list: I am looking for references or languages that have denasalization of a nasal vowel, where the vowel does not just become denasalized, but is replaced by an (oral) vowel plus engma sequence. A potential example from the Antwerp dialect of Flemish: Pre-Flemish stage 1: mEns 'person' Pre-Flemish stage 2: mE(Nasalized)s Contemporary stage: mEngs, where ng stands for a velar nasal. The interesting thing is that n nasalizes a preceding vowel, and then it is denasalized again, but with a following velar nasal, rather than the expected homorganic alveolar nasal. Apparently, vowel height also has an influence on denasalization, since the low vowel /a/ remains nasal in present day Antwerp, and does not evolve to ang. Thus Fra(nasal)s 'French' , not *Frangs. Any comments on similar denasalization phenomena would be most welcome. If there is enough response, I will summarize for the list. Willem J. de Reuse University of Arizona WDEREUSEMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueCCIT.ARIZONA.EDU
The Macquarie Dictionary staff have had a query about the etymology of the mining term 'goaf'. We have consulted the OED and the English Dialect Dictionary but are not much the wiser. We would appreciate any ideas about the etymology of this word. With thanks, Alison Moore, Macquarie DictionaryMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue