Editor for this issue: <>
There seems not to have been any (public) response to an inquiry of several weeks ago about a reconstructed Indo-European fable. Since I unfortunately neglected to save the original posting and just now recalled where I had come across the answer a long time ago, I have to reply to the net instead of to the poster. In 1868 August Schleicher published "Eine Fabel in indogermanischer Ursprache" in vol. 5 of _Beitraege zur vergleichender Sprachforschung_. His fable, "The Sheep and the Horses," was called "Avis akvasas ka" in the "original." The text, with Schleicher's translation into German and the editor's Russian translation, can be found in V. A. Zvegintsev, _Istoriia iazykoznaniia XIX i XX vekov v ocherkakh i izvlecheniiakh_ (Moscow, 1960), part 1, p. 104. Bob RothsteinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Here is the summary of responses to my query on undergraduate semantics textbooks. Like the previous summary (on syntax texts), this one is organized alphabetically by textbook author, with comments of the respondents thereafter. 1. Keith Allan, Linguistic Meaning, 2 vols. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986. Claudia Brugman finds this the most successful text for undergraduate semantics that she has found. Its shortcomings are (1): it is very light on formal semantics and almost as light on the topics covered by formal semantics; (2) both volumes are necessary for a complete class, which means that the students have a lot of reading and that they have to buy two expensive books. 2. Emmon Bach, Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics, SUNY Press. Nancy Goss used it for a short time in a course in which the main text was Frawley's (see below). She found that three weeks was too little time to cover formal semantics. 3. Ronnie Cann, Formal Semantics, Cambridge U. Press, 1993. David Adger liked teaching from it, "although it has a billion misprints," but his students found the course hard. 4. Gennaro Chierchia and Sally McConnell-Ginet, Meaning and Grammar, MIT Press, 1990. Nancy Goss used it as an undergraduate at Cornell and found it to be a good textbook. 5. William Frawley, Linguistic Semantics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992. Nancy Goss used it as a graduate student in a course that also contained undergraduate students. She still consults it regualrly for basic information on semantic topics and relevant literature. It contains no formal semantics. 6. Hurford and Heasley, Semantics: A Coursebook. David Adger was taught from it as an undergraduate and hated it, but when he taught from it, his students really liked it, probably because it's mainly taxonomic and fairly easy. Rob French liked it and so did his students, since it covers a lot of ground and is easy to supplement with material that goes deeper into particular topics.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue