Editor for this issue: <>
FISI-CS PARTICIPANT WORKSHOP LANGUAGE AND SPACE JULY 24, 1994 MODERATOR: Hubert Cuyckens In the various disciplines of cognitive science, the past few years have seen a surging interest in the relation between LANGUAGE and SPACE. For one thing, it has been assumed that, in tackling the relation between language and cognition, it would be easier to start with the spatial domain. Furthermore, spatial knowledge has been claimed to take up a privileged position in cognition in that "we typically conceptualize the nonphysical in terms of the physical" [Lakoff & Johnson, Metaphors we live by, p. 59]. In cognitive linguistics, for instance, spatial knowledge is often analyzed as the source domain of many linguistic expression. This workshop brings together a number of papers highlighting the relation between language and spatial cognition from different angles. PROGRAM JULY 24, 1994 MORNING 8:50 - 9:00 Welcome and Introduction 9:00 - 9:40 M.M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest (CNRS, Paris) Spatial cognition and the organization of discourse -- evidence from the Sami language (Lapland) 9:45 - 10:35 Alan Cienki (Emory University) STRAIGHT and CURVED as image schemas 10:35 - 10:50 Break 10:50 - 11:30 Linda Forrest (University of Oregon) Syntactic subject and focus of attention in language production 11:35 - 12:15 Hubert Cuyckens (University of Antwerp) Family resemblance structure in the Dutch spatial prepositions 'door' and 'langs' 12:15 - 1:30 Lunch AFTERNOON 1:30 - 2:10 Chris Sinha (University of Aarhus) Canonical rules: The role of material culture in spatial cognitive and language development 2:15 - 2:55 Melita Kovacevic & Milena Zic-Fuchs (University of Zagreb) An analysis of spatial relations in Croatian: A cognitive approach 2:55 - 3:10 Break 3:10 - 3:50 June Luchjenbroers (Hong Kong Polytechnic) Locations in space 3:55 - 4:35 Klaus-Peter Gapp (University of Saarbruecken) On the basic meaning of spatial relations: Computation and evaluation in 3D space 4:40 - 5:30 Informal discussion ABSTRACTS ** M.M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest Spatial cognition and the organization of discourse -- evidence from the Sami language (Lapland) The Sami language, in its northern variety, is taken here as a prototype of Orality. Some specific features of the language system seem to have an oral motivation, e.g., the rich spatio-temporal deixis (see the functional "mental maps" of reindeer-breeders as opposed to fishermen). The comparative study of Discourse Particles, often of spatial origin, furthermore suggests investigating conceptualization as anchored in physical experience and related to metaphorically structured processes. The recent accession of Sami to the written form implies a new relationship of the speakers [to their identity and] to their language: the Sami language, finding its way into new communication networks, is less contextualized. ** Alan Cienki STRAIGHT and CURVED as image schemas Recent studies within several veins of cognitive linguistics have explored image schemas as a means by which we organize and understand our experience. Using Mark Johnson's (1987: xiv) definition, "[a]n image schema is a recurring, dynamic pattern of our perceptual interactions and motor programs that gives coherence and structure to our experience." In this paper, I will propose STRAIGHT and CURVED as a pair of complementary image schemas which have not been recognized in previous cognitive linguistic research, and will explore how our experience and understanding of them as gestalts depends on both spatial and force-dynamic aspects of their structure. Supporting evidence comes from research in spatial perception and from the variety of metaphors in different languages which use STRAIGHT and CURVED as source domains. ** Linda Forrest Syntactic subject and focus of attention in language production When speakers map a mental representation onto a linguistic code, one fundamental problem is selection of syntactic subject. In choosing between 'the heart is above the star' or 'the star is below the heart,' speakers must take a perspective that seems to depend on which referent is focally attended. In two experiments, speakers produced locative sentences about pictures while their focus of attention was manipulated using visual cueing techniques developed in psychological research. Speakers chose attended figures as subject more frequently and produced utterances having attended figures as subject more quickly, providing strong evidence that English syntactic subject codes cognitive focus of attention. ** Hubert Cuyckens Family resemblance structure in the Dutch spatial prepositions 'door' and 'langs' In this paper, I will examine the semantic/conceptual information in the Dutch spatial prepositions 'door' and 'langs' and set up their family resemblance structure. These are the main lines of the analysis: Each of the uses of 'door' and 'langs' will be specified in terms of a bundle of cooccurring features (or, in other words, in terms of a featural configuration). Taken together, these uses constitute a network of interrelated featural configurations in which configurations either have features in common with one another or are transformationally linked (cf. Lakoff 1987: 425). As the family resemblance structures I would like to present systematically characterize the semantic/conceptual relations between the various uses of 'langs' en 'door', they also shed some light on how one use might be derived from (or motivated by) the other. ** Chris Sinha Canonical rules: The role of material culture in spatial cognitive and language development This paper argues on the basis of developmental evidence that spatial cognition and language is not organized solely on the basis of an unmediated mapping from the innate properties of the human perceptual system, but also represents socio-culturally standard (canonical) rules correlating object functions with object forms. Such canonical rules partly canalize the development of the human infant's representations of proximal space. The ontology of proximal space as humanly cognitively represented is co-constituted by human biology, the nature of the physical world, and human culture. ** Melita Kovacevic & Melita Zic-Fuchs An analysis of spatial relations in Croatian: A cognitive approach In Croatian, as in other similar languages, spatial relations are predominantly expressed by prepositions and other deictic expressions. Until now no systematic attempt has been made to analyze language acquisition in Croatian, and this is especially felt in specific domains such as spatial relations, which are interesting not only linguistically but also cognitively. The preliminary analysis of a pilot study of metalinguistic knowledge and spatial relations showed that the subjects had difficulties in dealing with spatial prepositions in sentence production in Croatian. This triggered off further investigation on a broader range of subjects (starting from pre-school to college students) that tested both their linguistic and conceptual competence in dealing with spatial relations. We discuss the implications of these findings in terms of the relationship between linguistic and cognitive determinants expressing spatial relations. ** June Luchjenbroers Locations in space My work looks at the process of on-line discourse comprehension and the establishment of mutual ground between discourse participants in terms of a schematic framework for cognitive (and linguistic) information processing. I have argued in my PHD thesis [Pragmatic inference in language processing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, 1993] that a conceptual construct of 'mutual ground' is a necessary formalism in courtroom discourse as verbal interactions are performed between two parties for the benefit of a third party (the jury) who do not participate but are the ones the barristers need to convince. Therefore, verbal interactions proceed on the basis of what jurors are presumed to know (i.e., hold in conceptual space). Temporal and locative units as well as a new pattern identified in my thesis, 'x prep y' (head+postmodifier) pattern, are discussed in terms of their anchoring and spatial properties as strategies for pointing to discourse locations in cognitive space. The data are the court transcripts of a Supreme Court murder trial, held over 6 days in Melbourne (Australia) during 1986, and encompass 33 witness testimonies. ** Klaus-Peter Gapp On the basic meaning of spatial relations: Computation and evaluation in 3D space Spatial relations play an important role in the research area of connecting visual and verbal space. In the last decade several approaches to semantics and computation of spatial relations in 2D space have been developed. Presented here is a new approach to the computation and evaluation of basic spatial relations' meanings in 3D space. We propose the use of various kinds of approximations when defining the basic semantics. The vagueness of the applicability of a spatial relation is accounted for by a flexible evaluation component which enables a cognitively plausible continuous gradation. For validating the evolved methods we have integrated them into a workbench. This workbench allows us to investigate the structure of a spatial relation's applicability region through various visualization methods.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue