Editor for this issue: <>
A long long time ago I posted a question similar to Dick Hudson's, asking whether there was work on how informants' (esp. linguists') judgments change over time and exposure. But (to my discredit), I never did post a summary. Here, very belatedly, is a summary of the (little) information I received: there was a) Carson Schutze's Univ. of Toronto M.A. thesis on the psychology of linguistic judgments; very nice thesis, but nothing definitive on this particular issue; b) memories of Haj Ross naming the "scanting out" phenomenon, in which too much thinking about certain judgments renders one incapable of making the judgment at all; c) a psychological effect called "semantic satiation", the data on which seemed to me to be only marginally relevant to syntactic judgments, though the idea might possibly be extendable to cover syntactic judgments. Joyce Tang Boyland (jtangMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecogsci.berkeley.edu)
The only clear examples involving a regular change of /x/ to /k/ in final position so far involve some Montenegrin dialects of Serbo-Croation (thanks to Wayles Browne for the references on this) and in some southern dialects of Polish (which I dug up myself). The reason I was interested, by the way 9since some of you asked), was because /x/ can come from /s/ (as it does in these two languages, in fact), so this would give me final /k/ from /s/. And that would be an analogue to the highly controversial change of Proto-Indo-European final */s/ to /kh/ in Armenian, originally mentioned but dismissed by Hubschmann (who discovered the true place of Armenian within Indo-European) and then proposed by Holger Pedersen (whom some of you may know as the grandfather of the glottalic theory of Indo-European and/or as the creator of the original version of the Nostratic theory and the coiner of the term 'Nostratisch'). I would like to thank everybody who wrote in in response to my query. Alexis Manaster RamerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue