Editor for this issue: <>
Does anyone know of any papers that: a) survey the types of phonological processes that occur as external sandhi, across languages b) compares external sandhi processes to internal sandhi processes, to see if there are any differences, cross-linguistically I'm looking specifically for a survey article, not for papers that address only one language. Within a given language, a phonological process might just be internal sandhi, or just be external, or be both. But what I'm interested in is whether, across languages, internal and external sandhi tend to be different. Are there some types of processes that can only be internal sandhi? Are there some types that can only be external sandhi? Or are internal and external sandhi pretty much comparable, differing only in the domain over which the process is defined? Send any responses directly to me. I'll summarize for the list. ---joe stemberger stembergMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemaroon.tc.umn.edu
For a seminar on verbal abuse and verbal self-defense in November, I am looking for markers of hostile language/verbal abuse in various languages. Not markers of anger only -- the reasonable expression of justifiable anger being equivalent to verbal abuse only by accident -- but markers of language that is hostile for the purpose of getting and holding attention, demonstrating power and control, etc. I am not after curses and obscenities but markers added to otherwise neutral language that can serve the purpose of conveying hostility . I have a handful of such items -- for English, Japanese, Navajo, and Aymara; I would greatly appreciate others. I will post a summary of responses. Suzette Haden Elgin shelginMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueaol.com
In preparation for writing a review paper on the psycholinguistics of translation and interpretation, I would like to hear from anyone who is doing empirical work in this area. Any research on the cognitive processes involved in translation and interpretation would be relevant. If you are conducting research in this area, or know of others, please let me know. If there is sufficient interest, I will post a summary of the responses to the list. Thanks for your help. Joe Danks Department of Psychology Kent State University Kent, OH 44242 bitnet: jdanksMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuekentvm internet: jdanks
kentvm.kent.edu
greetings, i just read a news item which indicates that a linguist has been nominated to the 24 member panel that oversees the National Science Foundation. would you or anyone on the list you moderate happen to know who that linguist is? thanks, carlMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue