Editor for this issue: <>
Call for Participation EMPIRICAL METHODS IN DISCOURSE INTERPRETATION AND GENERATION AAAI 1995 Spring Symposium Series March 27 - 29, 1995 Stanford University, California Computational theories of communicative action (discourse interpretation and generation) provide the basis for the design of many types of AI systems (e.g., intelligent tutors, believable agents, intelligent spoken language systems, intelligent software agents (softbots), etc.) Developing the robust, broad coverage, theories of discourse that are needed in today's systems requires an empirical basis. However, there are no shared methods, tools or resources for the discourse community. To date, much work in computational theories of discourse has focused on specifying the mechanisms underlying a particular discourse phenomenon. It is often difficult to tell how prevalent that phenomenon is, whether it is related to other observed and studied phenomena, and what percentage of the cases a particular theory covers. This symposium has two foci: (1) an investigation of the empirical methods that can be used in the development and evaluation of computational theories of discourse, (2) the development of a set of shared resources for the computational discourse community. We solicit papers that focus on empirical methods and their benefits, e.g., by presenting an empirical method and a result derived using that method, including but not limited to the following topics: o Corpus-Based methods as applied to theories of discourse. o Methods for evaluating dialogue or discourse modules in implemented systems. o Simulation tools or testbeds used in developing and evaluating theories of discourse. o Coding schemes developed and tested for the quantitative study of some discourse phenomenon, particularly papers that show that multiple judges can use the coding scheme with replicable results. o Tools that support (semi-)automatic or empirical studies of discourse phenomena. o Papers that apply or extend methods used in traditionally empirical disciplines (e.g., psychology or sociolinguistics) to computational theories of discourse. o Empirical analyses using any method that distinguishes between claims made by different computational discourse theories. Interested participants should submit 6 copies of either (1) a paper (in 12 pt font, not to exceed 3000 words) addressing one of the above points, or (2) a statement of interest briefly describing the author's relevant work in this area and listing recent relevant publications. Send contributions--plain ascii or postscript--by October 28, 1994 to walkerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemerl.com If electronic submission is impossible, please send six copies to Dr. Marilyn Walker, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, 201 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139 (phone: 617-621-7505; fax:617-621-7550). Notification of acceptance will be given by November 30, 1994. Material to be included in the working notes of the symposium must be received by January 20, 1995. Organizing Committee: Marilyn Walker (co-chair), Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs, walker
merl.com. Johanna Moore (co-chair), University of Pittsburgh, jmoore
cs.pitt.edu; Marti Hearst, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center; Lynette Hirschman, MITRE; Aravind Joshi, University of Pennsylvania;