Editor for this issue: <>
Ohio State Linguistics students are now making available dissertations written since 1992 by students in the linguistics department. For more information regarding available titles and abstracts as of January 1995, please visit our World Wide Web (WWW) Server at http://ling.ohio-state.edu/Department/Dissertations.html For information and ordering procedures, please contact OSDL (Ohio State Dissertations in Linguistics) Department of Linguistics Ohio State University 222 Oxley Hall osdlMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueling.ohio-state.edu 1712 Neil Avenue Columbus, OH 43210-1289 USA Dissertations available as of January 1995: Benjamin Xiaoping Ao (1993) Phonetics and Phonology of Nantong Chinese (Advisor: David Odden) Hee-Rahk Chae (1992) Lexically Triggered Unbounded Discontinuities in English: An Indexed Phrase Structure Grammar Approach (Advisor: Arnold Zwicky) John Xiang-ling Dai (1992) Chinese Morphology and its Interface with the Syntax (Advisor: Arnold Zwicky) Sun-Ah Jun (1993) The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody (Advisor: Mary E. Beckman) Gina Maureen Lee (1993) Comparative, Diachronic and Experimental Perspectives on the Interaction between Tone and Vowel in Standard Cantonese (Advisor: Brian D. Joseph) Katherine Welker (1994) Plans in the Common Ground: Toward a Generative Account of Conversational Implicature (Advisor: Craige Roberts) PS: Anyone reading LINGUIST via the WWW page at Rochester may visit our site by simply clicking (A HREF="http://ling.ohio-state.edu/Department/Dissertations.html") here(/A).
LINGUIST readers, I recently discovered an application that had been lurking on my hard drive for a while which has turned out to have some useful applications. The application is Microsoft Organization Chart. It came as a part of the Microsoft Office suite of applications that was bundled with my new Gateway. I imagine many of you may also have this application -- it is generally associated with PowerPoint, but it can run on its own, or in association with any other Windows program that allows object linking (OLE). MS Organization chart was designed for showing corporate organization structures, and it is organized around boxes that stand in hierarchical mother-daughter relationships to each other. The program makes adding and deleting nodes in such hierarchies very easy, and automatically connects then with the appropriate lines. I've experimented with this program and two linguistic applications: 1.) Genetic trees in historical linguistics, and 2.) Syntactic tree diagrams. A little discussion of each: 1.) Trees for historical linguistics -- The program does a superb job at rendering the sort of genetic trees that are conventionally used in discussions of historical linguistics. The user can manipulate just about every detail of the trees -- the order of branches, the types of fonts used for the labels, the thickness of the lines that connect the nodes. There are also options that allow the user to make any particular branch in the tree either vertical or horizontal, which is great for fitting lots of information onto a page. The resulting tree can be inserted into your other Windows applications. I've inserted them into my WordPerfect documents, and they work beautifully. (In WordPerfect 6.0 for Windows, I choose Insert Object from the menus, select Microsoft Organization Chart from the list, and create the tree. When I'm through, the tree acts like a graphic that I can move around, resize, etc.) On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd give this program a 10 for this application. 2.) Syntactic tree diagrams The program is not as good at these, but it does a pretty decent job at syntactic trees as well, and it has the virtue of being very quick and easy. A few notes on drawing syntactic trees: -- The default setting puts a box around each node in the tree, but you can easily select the boxes and set the border to "none". -- A more serious problem -- the default lines connecting the node are only vertical and horizontal, not diagonal, as is standard in syntactic diagrams. After some consideration, I've decided that this really doesn't bother me very much; you may disagree. It is possible to draw in diagonal lines by hand, but I found this tedious. I don't know if I would advise people to buy this program just for syntactic trees -- if the perfect syntactic tree drawing program would get a 10, I'd give Microsoft Organization Chart an 8 - it is quick and easy, but it doesn't do everything you might want. Overall, I've found this piece of software to be one of the more useful I've seen. I'd encourage LINGUIST readers to give it a try. Given the extensive distribution of MS Office software, you or your university may already have this. George Aaron Broadwell, g.broadwellMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuealbany.edu Anthropology; Linguistics and Cognitive Science, SUNY-Albany, Albany, NY 12222 | 518-442-4711 ----- "I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagraming sentences" -- Gertrude Stein