Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
I am looking for information on the investigation of what non-linguists notice about spoken language. Which aspects of spoken language (phonological, syntactical, lexical, and so on) catch people's attention, and how do non- linguists understand and categorize their awareness of others' speech? If anyone knows of research in this area, I would be grateful to hear about it. S. Krainz (V367MY88Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueubvms.cc.buffalo.edu)
Does anybody have any hints on how to help undergrads in an introductory phonetics class learn to hear lexical stress (that is, to identify the syllable in a word that receives primary stress), particulary in AmEng? The two "helps" I know are 1) say the word several times, over-emphasizing one syllable at a time (I've just done this by example, using extreme f0 & intensity variation). One production should sound reasonably normal and the rest should sound pretty odd; or 2) tap your finger as you say the word; folks usually tap on the stressed syllable. While most students I've had seem to grasp this fairly quickly, I still have a few who, after numerous examples, look at me as if I'm being utterly mystical. Some of these are non-native speakers of English, but not all. I realize that this question calls up all sorts of issues on the nature of stress and its perception, but before one can address those at all it's necessary to introduce the concept somehow, and so far my experience has been that introductory discussions of stress in phonetics texts ultimately assume that speakers can pretty reliably "hear stress" once the phenomenon is pointed out to them--that is, that there's something intuitively obvious about the notion of a stressed syllable. But what about those students/ speakers who apparently find nothing intuitive about it? Thanks laura l. koenig (koenigMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehaskins.yale.edu)
I am currently involved in research on how individuals learn (1) language(s) and (2) general knowledge (i.e., factual information). While there is con- siderable research on students' learning strategies (techniques such as rote- memorizing, writing notes, practicing aloud, studying in groups/alone, immersin g oneself in a language/culture, reading texts, listening to lectures, working with materials in a hands-on manner, etc), there appears to be little data on the preferred styles and strategies of individuals who continue to be immersed in a "learning" environment such as schools, colleges and universities - in other words, teachers, instructors, researchers, lecturers, etc. I would appreciate any feedback members of this list could provide con- cerning (1) their personal learning style (e.g., habitual mode of learning new material), (2) their preferred learning strategies for languages and/or factual information, and (3) their opinion on whether they believe (1) and (2) may influence their lecturing or teaching style. I would like to thank you in advance for your input on this matter. Please respond to: Karen Woodman kwoodmanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuvvm.uvic.ca