Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
On occasion I have heard or read papers, usually on discourse, that use as data excerpts from the conversation or interview books by Studs Terkel (such as _Working_ or _The Good War_). As a resident of Chicago, I have the opportunity to hear Studs Terkel's daily radio program broadcast on WFMT. Once in a while, I have happened to read a passage in one of the books within a few days of hearing the same interview in a broadcast, and I have noticed that the published version does not correspond exactly to what is on the tape. That is, Studs Terkel edits the material for style before it goes into print. I had the opportunity to confirm this in a brief conversation with Studs Terkel on Saturday afternoon, 29 July 1995. (He's a lot haler than any 85- year-old could expect to be.) First, when I told him his works were being used as data by linguists, he was immensely pleased, and he said, "You've made my day"; but he also confirmed that he edits the words of his subjects before he publishes them, and gave me his blessing to announce this to linguists who may be interested. The conversations in Terkel's books give every impression of being the genuine words of the people who speak them--and they would certainly recognize themselves in the excerpts--but Studs Terkel is a very accomplished literary artist, and doesn't want his work to be acclaimed as the ipsissima verba of his workers, his soldiers, or any of his other subjects. I'm sure he'd like to receive copies of papers that cite his writings; you could send them to him c/o WFMT, 303 E. Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60601. - Peter T. Daniels, pdanielsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuepress-gopher.uchicago.edu