Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
I am writing to ask Alexis Manaster Ramer a simple question concerning the universality of certain phenomena: how come about a hundred languages are spoken in present-day Russia despite the attempts to russify everyone? This linguist seems to be very active, yet unfortunately he tends to generalize the information he is aware of, judging by his contribution to the discussion on he/she pronouns and his remarks concerning Russian linguistic policies. I would like to tell him of a common example concerning various ethnicities in Russia: in 1553 Czar Ivan the Dreadful incorporated the Mari, Mordvin (Finnic), Chuvash and Tatars (Turkic) nationalities into his state.Nowadays these peoples live in the very heart of Russia on the middle Volga, and, apparently, enjoy their culture and languages. They have also contributed to the culture and language of the dominant nation. The infamous Cossacks (farmers living on the borders of the state and ready to resort to arms to protect them, a sort of Michigan militia) have preserved their language while acquiring a lot of culture from, say, mountaineers of the Caucausus. Yet they did not assimilate those peoples who still speak their languages. To draw parallels between nostratic universal processes and the language policies of Russia might hardly be considered an appropriate example. It would rather be the opposite of the desired. Valeri Vassiliev St. John'sMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue