Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
Alex missed the main linguistics reference on uniformitarianism: Bill Labov's many discussions of language change. E.g. There's a section of `The social setting of linguistic change' called `The study of sound change in progress: the Uniformitarian Principle', reprinted in "Sociolinguistic Patterns" (1972, Blackwell), p. 274ff. Also numerous references, especially pp 21-3, in his recent "Principles of Linguistic Change" (1994, Blackwell). =========================================================================== Prof Richard Hudson Tel: +44 171 387 7050 ext 3152 E-mail: r.hudsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueling.ucl.ac.uk Dept. of Phonetics and Linguistics Tel: +44 171 380 7172 Fax: +44 171 383 4108 UCL Gower Street London WC1E 6BT UK
Just to broaden out the discussion a little, may I report an interesting fact that seemed to emerge from a discussion on another list. It concerns naming practices in some parts (or is it by some people?) in the USA: parents call their sons `son' but not their daughters `daughter'. (E.g. "Come here son/*daughter, I have something to tell you!") What's interesting about this is (a) the different treatment of the sexes and (b) the fact that sons are treated like senior relatives, since the normal pattern for junior relatives is to use the given name, while role-based names are normal for senior relatives. I don't think this practice is at all widespread in UK. =========================================================================== Prof Richard Hudson Tel: +44 171 387 7050 ext 3152 E-mail: r.hudsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueling.ucl.ac.uk Dept. of Phonetics and Linguistics Tel: +44 171 380 7172 Fax: +44 171 383 4108 UCL Gower Street London WC1E 6BT UK