Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
Several weeks ago I posted a query in connection with the exceedingly frequent vowel-initial lexical items of Basque, in which perhaps 50% of native nouns and adjectives are V-initial (I exclude verbs, since ancient verbs almost invariably show a prefix */e-/ in their non-finite forms.) I asked whether other languages (apart from the initial-dropping languages of Australia) show a comparable frequency of initial vowels and, if so, whether a historical explanation is known. I was particularly interested in hearing about possible cases of the lenition and loss of initial voiceless plosives, an explanation proposed for an ancient stage of Basque by Andre' Martinet. One respondent queried whether there was adequate statistical evidence to assert that the Basque case is indeed unusual. I know of no such evidence, and indeed one of my purposes was to try to find out whether Basque is really as unusual as is commonly believed by vasconists. The following languages were cited in the responses. POLYNESIAN: The Proto-Austronesian consonant system has undergone considerable attrition in the Polynesian languages, which today exhibit between eight and twelve consonants apiece. In Hawaiian, in which Proto-Polynesian */h/ and */?/ have been categorically lost, V-initial words appear to be rather common. But I could not find any explicit discussion of this, and my impression of such Hawaiian texts as I could find is that the proportion of V-initial words probably does not approach 40%, though I am ready to be corrected on this. NIGER-CONGO: Initial vowels are frequent in a number of West African languages which are not closely related; the initial vowels generally appear to be of morphological origin. There is uncertainty as to whether the vowels are fossilized noun-class prefixes (the most popular explanation) or the residue of derivational processes, such as for making agentive nouns out of verbs. In the Cross River languages of Nigeria, most nouns are V-initial; in some of these languages, virtually all nouns are. Here it seems clear that the initial Vs are fossilizations of ancient noun-class prefixes, in most cases derived from original CV- prefixes by loss of the C. In at least some of these languages, most verb forms are also V-initial, but only because the presence of fully functional agreement markers. Benue-Congo languages generally lack a distinct class of adjectives. In some Benue-Congo languages, and especially in some Bantu languages, CV- prefixes have instead been augmented for morphological reasons to yield VCV- prefixes, again producing frequent initial vowels. Ancient noun-class prefixes appear to be recoverable to varying extents in many Niger-Congo languages, especially in Bantu. Importantly, the original semantic values of the prefixes can often be determined, though this is not always the case. The Kwa language (Bini) Edo is unusual in that every single noun must begin with a vowel, so that even C-initial loans from English have vowels prefixed, apparently purely for morpheme-structure reasons. Yoruba is noteworthy in that it has around 45% of V-initial words, even though four of its ten vowels cannot appear initially. CATALAN: A rough estimate suggests that Catalan words are about 32% V-initial, rather more than one might expect in a language with 7 vowels and 22 consonants, and more, I suspect, than are typically found in Romance languages. I know of no particular reason for this. ARAWAN (Amazonia): Many of these languages have frequent V-initial words. It is suggested (but not established) that these derive from the loss of initial glottals. In at least some of these languages, V-initial words differ from C-initial words in that the first group may never bear stress on the first syllable. BERBER: Masculine-gender nouns regularly take a prefix /a-/, while feminine nouns take /ta-/. MUSKOGEAN: These have VC- prefixes on V-initial words but CV- prefixes on C-initial words. It is not clear to me what this means overall. SIOUXAN: These seem to have undergone heavy reduction of initials, not entirely unlike the Australian initial-dropping languages, but the results have been complex. Siouxan languages particularly show the lenition of initial /p[h]/ > /f/ > /h/, and possibly also some cases of /t[h]/ > /h/. GERMANIC: The change /k[h]/ > /x/ > /h/ is well attested here, but not, as a rule, exclusively in word-initial position (though sometimes in syllable-initial position). Lenition of voiceless plosives generally is widespread in Germanic. On the basis of this admittedly unscientific sample, I would therefore suggest the following conclusions: (1) Languages in which 40% or more of nouns are V-initial are not exceedingly rare, but they do not appear to be at all common. The majority of the examples come from Niger-Congo. (2) In Niger-Congo, the initial vowels derive chiefly from morphological sources, probably entirely so apart from the reduction of CV- prefixes to V- in some languages. Fossilized noun-class prefixes appear to be the most widely accepted origin in most cases, and such prefixes appear to be certain in some cases, in which the semantic value of the prefixes is still recoverable. But other morphological processes may be responsible in some other cases. (3) Outside of Niger-Congo, there appears to be little evidence of morphological origins for initial vowels, and loss of initial consonants is more usually invoked. The consonants invoked are, unsurprisingly, more likely to be glottals than oral obstruents. (4) Except perhaps in Siouxan, there is little or no evidence for the systematic loss of initial voiceless plosives. So what happened in Basque? I still don't know. The American long-ranger John Bengtson has for years been defending the "fossilized noun-class prefix" view of the Basque initial vowels, for reasons of his own, but there seems to be no trace of any semantic correlations with the initial vowels, and in fact the frequency of each of the five Basque vowels appears to be about the same initially as elsewhere: a > e > i > o > u. My money is therefore still on the systematic loss of certain initial consonants, but I'll be very surprised if I ever have to pay out or get to collect. My thanks to Maile Rehbock, Bruce Connell, Max Wheeler, Dan Everett, John Koontz, David Stampe, Mark Liberman, Herbert Stahlke, and Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy for their helpful responses. Larry Trask COGS University of Sussex Brighton BN1 9QH England larrytMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecogs.susx.ac.uk